[RFC][PATCH 4/6] x86/topo: Replace x86_has_numa_in_package

[Peter Zijlstra]

.. with the brand spanking new __num_nodes_per_package.

Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c |   13 +++----------
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

--- a/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c
@@ -468,13 +468,6 @@ static int x86_cluster_flags(void)
 }
 #endif
 
-/*
- * Set if a package/die has multiple NUMA nodes inside.
- * AMD Magny-Cours, Intel Cluster-on-Die, and Intel
- * Sub-NUMA Clustering have this.
- */
-static bool x86_has_numa_in_package;
-
 static struct sched_domain_topology_level x86_topology[] = {
 	SDTL_INIT(tl_smt_mask, cpu_smt_flags, SMT),
 #ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_CLUSTER
@@ -496,7 +489,7 @@ static void __init build_sched_topology(
 	 * PKG domain since the NUMA domains will auto-magically create the
 	 * right spanning domains based on the SLIT.
 	 */
-	if (x86_has_numa_in_package) {
+	if (__num_nodes_per_package > 1) {
 		unsigned int pkgdom = ARRAY_SIZE(x86_topology) - 2;
 
 		memset(&x86_topology[pkgdom], 0, sizeof(x86_topology[pkgdom]));
@@ -550,7 +543,7 @@ int arch_sched_node_distance(int from, i
 	case INTEL_GRANITERAPIDS_X:
 	case INTEL_ATOM_DARKMONT_X:
 
-		if (!x86_has_numa_in_package || topology_max_packages() == 1 ||
+		if (topology_max_packages() == 1 || __num_nodes_per_package == 1 ||
 		    d < REMOTE_DISTANCE)
 			return d;
 
@@ -606,7 +599,7 @@ void set_cpu_sibling_map(int cpu)
 		o = &cpu_data(i);
 
 		if (match_pkg(c, o) && !topology_same_node(c, o))
-			x86_has_numa_in_package = true;
+			WARN_ON_ONCE(__num_nodes_per_package == 1);
 
 		if ((i == cpu) || (has_smt && match_smt(c, o)))
 			link_mask(topology_sibling_cpumask, cpu, i);