Re: [PATCH 4/4] btrfs: clean coding style errors in extent-tree.c

[Qu Wenruo]

在 2026/2/28 05:01, Adarsh Das 写道:
> As the previous commits are changing code in extent-tree, this patch
> takes the oppurtunity to fix checkpatch errors in the same files. All
> the errors were formatting related.
>
> Signed-off-by: Adarsh Das <adarshdas950@xxxxxxxxx>

Just fold this into the previous patch.

Thanks,
Qu

> ---
>   fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c | 7 +++----
>   1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c b/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
> index 9748a4c5bc2d..8ea88174e4d5 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
> @@ -2111,7 +2111,7 @@ static noinline int __btrfs_run_delayed_refs(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
>   			 * head
>   			 */
>   			ret = cleanup_ref_head(trans, locked_ref, &bytes_processed);
> -			if (ret > 0 ) {
> +			if (ret > 0) {
>   				/* We dropped our lock, we need to loop. */
>   				ret = 0;
>   				continue;
> @@ -4351,8 +4351,7 @@ static int find_free_extent_update_loop(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
>   			if (ret == -ENOSPC) {
>   				ret = 0;
>   				ffe_ctl->loop++;
> -			}
> -			else if (ret < 0)
> +			} else if (ret < 0)
>   				btrfs_abort_transaction(trans, ret);
>   			else
>   				ret = 0;
> @@ -5676,7 +5675,7 @@ static int check_ref_exists(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
>   		 * If we get 0 then we found our reference, return 1, else
>   		 * return the error if it's not -ENOENT;
>   		 */
> -		return (ret < 0 ) ? ret : 1;
> +		return (ret < 0) ? ret : 1;
>   	}
>   
>   	/*