Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] dt-bindings: bridge: lt8713sx: Add bindings

[Vishnu Saini]

On Wed, Feb 25, 2026 at 11:35:45AM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 24, 2026 at 11:25:35PM +0530, Vishnu Saini wrote:
> > Add bindings for lt8713sx.
> > 
> > Co-developed-by: Prahlad Valluru <vvalluru@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Prahlad Valluru <vvalluru@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Vishnu Saini <vishnu.saini@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: 朱晓明 <xmzhu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Please use latin transliteration/translation, if possible.
> 
> > ---
> >  .../bindings/display/bridge/lontium,lt8713sx.yaml  | 113 +++++++++++++++++++++
> >  1 file changed, 113 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/bridge/lontium,lt8713sx.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/bridge/lontium,lt8713sx.yaml
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 000000000000..29a773154b39
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/bridge/lontium,lt8713sx.yaml
> > @@ -0,0 +1,113 @@
> > +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause)
> > +%YAML 1.2
> > +---
> > +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/display/bridge/lontium,lt8713sx.yaml#
> > +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
> > +
> > +title: Lontium LT8713SX Type-C/DP1.4 to Type-C/DP1.4/HDMI2.0/DP++ bridge-hub
> > +
> > +maintainers:
> > +  - Tony <syyang@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Is Tony full legal name, transliterated to Latin alphabet?
> 
> Also Tony, please kindly ack this change.


Lontium has confirmed that I am allowed to use my full legal name and email address as Author and Maintainer.

Their response was:
"After we provide the drivers to other customers, they modify them according to their needs and submit
them to the community, all using their full names and email addresses.
We think you can also use your full name and email address."

In the next revision, I will update the Author and Maintainer fields accordingly.
Apologies for not proactively confirming this with Lontium earlier.

 
> You already received such question at v3 :/
> 
> Also not sure why I am spending my time SECOND time on it. Read very
> carefully all the rules:
> 
> <form letter>
> This is a friendly reminder during the review process.
> 
> It looks like you received a tag and forgot to add it.
> 
> If you do not know the process, here is a short explanation:
> Please add Acked-by/Reviewed-by/Tested-by tags when posting new
> versions of patchset, under or above your Signed-off-by tag, unless
> patch changed significantly (e.g. new properties added to the DT
> bindings). Tag is "received", when provided in a message replied to you
> on the mailing list. Tools like b4 can help here. However, there's no
> need to repost patches *only* to add the tags. The upstream maintainer
> will do that for tags received on the version they apply.
> 
> Please read:
> https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.12-rc3/source/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst#L577
> 
> If a tag was not added on purpose, please state why and what changed.
> </form letter>
> 
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>