[PATCH 6.19 476/844] net: do not pass flow_id to set_rps_cpu()
From: Sasha Levin
Date: Sat Feb 28 2026 - 14:14:08 EST
From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@xxxxxxxxxx>
[ Upstream commit 8a8a9fac9efa6423fd74938b940cb7d731780718 ]
Blamed commit made the assumption that the RPS table for each receive
queue would have the same size, and that it would not change.
Compute flow_id in set_rps_cpu(), do not assume we can use the value
computed by get_rps_cpu(). Otherwise we risk out-of-bound access
and/or crashes.
Fixes: 48aa30443e52 ("net: Cache hash and flow_id to avoid recalculation")
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Krishna Kumar <krikku@xxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@xxxxxxxxxx>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260220222605.3468081-1-edumazet@xxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
net/core/dev.c | 12 +++++-------
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/core/dev.c b/net/core/dev.c
index f5e4040e08399..60a26208cbd87 100644
--- a/net/core/dev.c
+++ b/net/core/dev.c
@@ -4988,8 +4988,7 @@ static bool rps_flow_is_active(struct rps_dev_flow *rflow,
static struct rps_dev_flow *
set_rps_cpu(struct net_device *dev, struct sk_buff *skb,
- struct rps_dev_flow *rflow, u16 next_cpu, u32 hash,
- u32 flow_id)
+ struct rps_dev_flow *rflow, u16 next_cpu, u32 hash)
{
if (next_cpu < nr_cpu_ids) {
u32 head;
@@ -5000,6 +4999,7 @@ set_rps_cpu(struct net_device *dev, struct sk_buff *skb,
struct rps_dev_flow *tmp_rflow;
unsigned int tmp_cpu;
u16 rxq_index;
+ u32 flow_id;
int rc;
/* Should we steer this flow to a different hardware queue? */
@@ -5015,6 +5015,7 @@ set_rps_cpu(struct net_device *dev, struct sk_buff *skb,
if (!flow_table)
goto out;
+ flow_id = rfs_slot(hash, flow_table);
tmp_rflow = &flow_table->flows[flow_id];
tmp_cpu = READ_ONCE(tmp_rflow->cpu);
@@ -5062,7 +5063,6 @@ static int get_rps_cpu(struct net_device *dev, struct sk_buff *skb,
struct rps_dev_flow_table *flow_table;
struct rps_map *map;
int cpu = -1;
- u32 flow_id;
u32 tcpu;
u32 hash;
@@ -5109,8 +5109,7 @@ static int get_rps_cpu(struct net_device *dev, struct sk_buff *skb,
/* OK, now we know there is a match,
* we can look at the local (per receive queue) flow table
*/
- flow_id = rfs_slot(hash, flow_table);
- rflow = &flow_table->flows[flow_id];
+ rflow = &flow_table->flows[rfs_slot(hash, flow_table)];
tcpu = rflow->cpu;
/*
@@ -5129,8 +5128,7 @@ static int get_rps_cpu(struct net_device *dev, struct sk_buff *skb,
((int)(READ_ONCE(per_cpu(softnet_data, tcpu).input_queue_head) -
rflow->last_qtail)) >= 0)) {
tcpu = next_cpu;
- rflow = set_rps_cpu(dev, skb, rflow, next_cpu, hash,
- flow_id);
+ rflow = set_rps_cpu(dev, skb, rflow, next_cpu, hash);
}
if (tcpu < nr_cpu_ids && cpu_online(tcpu)) {
--
2.51.0