Re: [PATCH v4 2/4] x86/cpu: Add platform ID to CPU info structure
From: Pawan Gupta
Date: Wed Mar 04 2026 - 21:26:52 EST
On Wed, Mar 04, 2026 at 10:10:20AM -0800, Dave Hansen wrote:
>
> From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> The end goal here is to be able to do x86_match_cpu() and match on a
> specific platform ID. While it would be possible to stash this ID
> off somewhere or read it dynamically, that approaches would not be
> consistent with the other fields which can be matched.
>
> Read the platform ID and store it in cpuinfo_x86.
>
> There are lots of sites to set this new field. Place it near
> the place c->microcode is established since the platform ID is
> so closely intertwined with microcode updates.
>
> Note: This should not grow the size of 'struct cpuinfo_x86' in
> practice since the u8 fits next to another u8 in the structure.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Reviewed-by: Sohil Mehta <sohil.mehta@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Pawan Gupta <pawan.kumar.gupta@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: "Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: x86@xxxxxxxxxx
> Cc: Jon Kohler <jon@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> --
>
> Changes from v2:
> * rename x86_platform_id=>intel_platform_id and remove
> initialization from generic code
> * Add a amd_unused so it's clear the AMD folks have a
> free field to play with.
> ---
>
> b/arch/x86/include/asm/microcode.h | 2 ++
> b/arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h | 5 +++++
> b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c | 1 +
> b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c | 2 +-
> 4 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff -puN arch/x86/include/asm/microcode.h~cpu-x86_stepping arch/x86/include/asm/microcode.h
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/microcode.h~cpu-x86_stepping 2026-02-24 15:37:21.947261472 -0800
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/microcode.h 2026-02-24 15:37:21.955261858 -0800
> @@ -61,6 +61,8 @@ static inline int intel_microcode_get_da
> return hdr->datasize ? : DEFAULT_UCODE_DATASIZE;
> }
>
> +extern u32 intel_get_platform_id(void);
> +
> static inline u32 intel_get_microcode_revision(void)
> {
> u32 rev, dummy;
> diff -puN arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h~cpu-x86_stepping arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h~cpu-x86_stepping 2026-02-24 15:37:21.949261568 -0800
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h 2026-02-24 15:37:21.955261858 -0800
> @@ -140,6 +140,11 @@ struct cpuinfo_x86 {
> __u32 x86_vfm;
> };
> __u8 x86_stepping;
> + union {
> + // MSR_IA32_PLATFORM_ID[52-50]
> + __u8 intel_platform_id;
> + __u8 amd_unused;
> + };
> #ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
> /* Number of 4K pages in DTLB/ITLB combined(in pages): */
> int x86_tlbsize;
> diff -puN arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c~cpu-x86_stepping arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c~cpu-x86_stepping 2026-02-24 15:37:21.950261617 -0800
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c 2026-02-24 15:37:21.955261858 -0800
> @@ -205,6 +205,7 @@ static void early_init_intel(struct cpui
>
> if (c->x86 >= 6 && !cpu_has(c, X86_FEATURE_IA64))
> c->microcode = intel_get_microcode_revision();
> + c->intel_platform_id = intel_get_platform_id();
Just want to make sure that c->intel_platform_id not getting explicitly
initialized for !CONFIG_CPU_SUP_INTEL is okay. I believe it is fine because
the global boot_cpu_data should be zero-initialized.
I see model and stepping are being initialized in identify_cpu(), but I
don't see any vendor specific initialization here:
identify_cpu()
{
int i;
c->loops_per_jiffy = loops_per_jiffy;
c->x86_cache_size = 0;
c->x86_vendor = X86_VENDOR_UNKNOWN;
c->x86_model = c->x86_stepping = 0; /* So far unknown... */
Reviewed-by: Pawan Gupta <pawan.kumar.gupta@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>