Re: [PATCH v4 02/24] coco/tdx-host: Introduce a "tdx_host" device

[Dave Hansen]

On 3/5/26 18:13, Chao Gao wrote:
> I don't have a strong preference, but I'll standardize on "TDX
> Module" since it matches the Base Architecture Specification, which
> I think is the most authoritative source about TDX Module features/
> terms.
How about doing what the Linux kernel does -- and has been doing --
instead of trying to pick a new policy a few years into the kernel
dealing with TDX?

"TDX module" was the first and it's 20x more common in the history than
the next closest one:

$ git log -p arch/x86/ | grep -i -o 'tdx[- ]module' | sort | uniq -c |
sort -n
      2 TDX-module
     21 TDX-Module
     26 TDX Module
    501 TDX module

If you don't have a strong preference, why are you arguing for change now?