Re: [PATCH v7 1/6] iio: imu: st_lsm6dsx: Fix check for invalid samples from FIFO
From: Jonathan Cameron
Date: Sat Mar 07 2026 - 07:46:48 EST
On Wed, 4 Mar 2026 09:06:00 +0100
Francesco Lavra <flavra@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> The DRDY_MASK feature implemented in sensor chips marks gyroscope and
> accelerometer invalid samples (i.e. samples that have been acquired during
> the settling time of sensor filters) with the special values 0x7FFFh,
> 0x7FFE, and 0x7FFD.
> The driver checks FIFO samples against these special values in order to
> discard invalid samples; however, it does the check regardless of the type
> of samples being processed, whereas this feature is specific to gyroscope
> and accelerometer data. This could cause valid samples to be discarded.
>
> Fix the above check so that it takes into account the type of samples being
> processed. To avoid casting to __le16 * when checking sample values, clean
> up the type representation for data read from the FIFO.
>
> Fixes: 960506ed2c69 ("iio: imu: st_lsm6dsx: enable drdy-mask if available")
> Signed-off-by: Francesco Lavra <flavra@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Looks fine to me, but looking for a Lorenzo tag ideally given it's not
a particularly trivial fix!
Jonathan
> ---
> .../iio/imu/st_lsm6dsx/st_lsm6dsx_buffer.c | 23 +++++++++++--------
> 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/imu/st_lsm6dsx/st_lsm6dsx_buffer.c b/drivers/iio/imu/st_lsm6dsx/st_lsm6dsx_buffer.c
> index 5b28a3ffcc3d..a6ee2da5a06c 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/imu/st_lsm6dsx/st_lsm6dsx_buffer.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/imu/st_lsm6dsx/st_lsm6dsx_buffer.c
> @@ -365,8 +365,6 @@ static inline int st_lsm6dsx_read_block(struct st_lsm6dsx_hw *hw, u8 addr,
> return 0;
> }
>
> -#define ST_LSM6DSX_IIO_BUFF_SIZE (ALIGN(ST_LSM6DSX_SAMPLE_SIZE, \
> - sizeof(s64)) + sizeof(s64))
> /**
> * st_lsm6dsx_read_fifo() - hw FIFO read routine
> * @hw: Pointer to instance of struct st_lsm6dsx_hw.
> @@ -539,14 +537,14 @@ int st_lsm6dsx_read_fifo(struct st_lsm6dsx_hw *hw)
> #define ST_LSM6DSX_INVALID_SAMPLE 0x7ffd
> static int
> st_lsm6dsx_push_tagged_data(struct st_lsm6dsx_hw *hw, u8 tag,
> - u8 *data, s64 ts)
> + __le16 *data, s64 ts)
> {
> - s16 val = le16_to_cpu(*(__le16 *)data);
> struct st_lsm6dsx_sensor *sensor;
> struct iio_dev *iio_dev;
>
> /* invalid sample during bootstrap phase */
> - if (val >= ST_LSM6DSX_INVALID_SAMPLE)
> + if ((tag == ST_LSM6DSX_GYRO_TAG || tag == ST_LSM6DSX_ACC_TAG) &&
> + (s16)le16_to_cpup(data) >= ST_LSM6DSX_INVALID_SAMPLE)
> return -EINVAL;
>
> /*
> @@ -609,7 +607,13 @@ int st_lsm6dsx_read_tagged_fifo(struct st_lsm6dsx_hw *hw)
> * must be passed a buffer that is aligned to 8 bytes so
> * as to allow insertion of a naturally aligned timestamp.
> */
> - u8 iio_buff[ST_LSM6DSX_IIO_BUFF_SIZE] __aligned(8);
> + struct {
> + union {
> + __le16 data[3];
> + __le32 fifo_ts;
> + };
> + aligned_s64 timestamp;
> + } iio_buff = { };
> u8 tag;
> bool reset_ts = false;
> int i, err, read_len;
> @@ -648,7 +652,7 @@ int st_lsm6dsx_read_tagged_fifo(struct st_lsm6dsx_hw *hw)
>
> for (i = 0; i < pattern_len;
> i += ST_LSM6DSX_TAGGED_SAMPLE_SIZE) {
> - memcpy(iio_buff, &hw->buff[i + ST_LSM6DSX_TAG_SIZE],
> + memcpy(&iio_buff, &hw->buff[i + ST_LSM6DSX_TAG_SIZE],
> ST_LSM6DSX_SAMPLE_SIZE);
>
> tag = hw->buff[i] >> 3;
> @@ -659,7 +663,7 @@ int st_lsm6dsx_read_tagged_fifo(struct st_lsm6dsx_hw *hw)
> * B0 = ts[7:0], B1 = ts[15:8], B2 = ts[23:16],
> * B3 = ts[31:24]
> */
> - ts = le32_to_cpu(*((__le32 *)iio_buff));
> + ts = le32_to_cpu(iio_buff.fifo_ts);
> /*
> * check if hw timestamp engine is going to
> * reset (the sensor generates an interrupt
> @@ -670,7 +674,8 @@ int st_lsm6dsx_read_tagged_fifo(struct st_lsm6dsx_hw *hw)
> reset_ts = true;
> ts *= hw->ts_gain;
> } else {
> - st_lsm6dsx_push_tagged_data(hw, tag, iio_buff,
> + st_lsm6dsx_push_tagged_data(hw, tag,
> + iio_buff.data,
> ts);
> }
> }