Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] mm/huge_memory: Prevent huge zeropage refcount corruption in PMD move

[Chris Down]

David Hildenbrand (Arm) writes:
> Please squash that patch directly in #1.
>
> It doesn't make sense to leave something partially fixed in #1. It's
> been completely broken from the start. folio_mk_pmd() should never have
> been used.

The reason was to make sure that in theory the correct trees can be updated 
based on Fixes: for each. But I agree that it probably doesn't really matter.

> Apart from that, the end results LGTM, thanks