Re: [PATCH] KVM: Change [g|h]va_t as u64

[Anshuman Khandual]

On 08/03/26 6:28 PM, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
> On 06/03/26 11:46 PM, Sean Christopherson wrote:
>> On Fri, Mar 06, 2026, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
>>> Change both [g|h]va_t as u64 to be consistent with other address types.
>>
>> That's hilariously, blatantly wrong.
> 
> Sorry did not understand how this is wrong. Both guest and host
> virtual address types should be be contained in u64 rather than
> 'unsigned long'. Did I miss something else here.

Is this about 32 bit systems where unsigned long would have matched
a 32 bit pointer size where as u64 will not ? But would not the u64
still contain 32 bit pointer without any issues.