RE: [PATCH v4 1/4] dt-bindings: PCI: pci-imx6: Change maxItems of clocks and clock-names to 6

[Hongxing Zhu]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: 2026年3月11日 14:18
> To: Hongxing Zhu <hongxing.zhu@xxxxxxx>
> Cc: robh@xxxxxxxxxx; krzk+dt@xxxxxxxxxx; conor+dt@xxxxxxxxxx;
> bhelgaas@xxxxxxxxxx; Frank Li <frank.li@xxxxxxx>; l.stach@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> lpieralisi@xxxxxxxxxx; kwilczynski@xxxxxxxxxx; mani@xxxxxxxxxx;
> s.hauer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; festevam@xxxxxxxxx;
> linux-pci@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; imx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/4] dt-bindings: PCI: pci-imx6: Change maxItems of
> clocks and clock-names to 6
>
> On Tue, Mar 10, 2026 at 03:54:56PM +0800, Richard Zhu wrote:
> > Previous commit 1352f58d7c8d ("dt-bindings: PCI: pci-imx6: Add
> > external reference clock input")
>
> Please run scripts/checkpatch.pl on the patches and fix reported warnings.
> After that, run also 'scripts/checkpatch.pl --strict' on the patches and (probably)
> fix more warnings. Some warnings can be ignored, especially from --strict run,
> but the code here looks like it needs a fix. Feel free to get in touch if the
> warning is not clear.
>
> <form letter>
> This is a friendly reminder during the review process.
>
> It looks like you received a tag and forgot to add it.
>
> If you do not know the process, here is a short explanation:
> Please add Acked-by/Reviewed-by/Tested-by tags when posting new versions of
> patchset, under or above your Signed-off-by tag, unless patch changed
> significantly (e.g. new properties added to the DT bindings). Tag is "received",
> when provided in a message replied to you on the mailing list. Tools like b4 can
> help here. However, there's no need to repost patches *only* to add the tags.
> The upstream maintainer will do that for tags received on the version they
> apply.
>
> Please read:
> https://elixir.boo/
> tlin.com%2Flinux%2Fv6.12-rc3%2Fsource%2FDocumentation%2Fprocess%2Fsub
> mitting-patches.rst%23L577&data=05%7C02%7Chongxing.zhu%40nxp.com%7C
> 0ab010f0a2344157b9e208de7f35f689%7C686ea1d3bc2b4c6fa92cd99c5c3016
> 35%7C0%7C0%7C639088066900523007%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFb
> XB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFp
> bCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=4dDw4GIiEVwRjnZhYgfL7sKm
> udjcs8ciDKi022n78zQ%3D&reserved=0
>
> If a tag was not added on purpose, please state why and what changed.
> </form letter>
Hi Krzysztof:
I just received your tag in [PATCH v3 1/4] at 4:00 PM after I sent out
 the v4 patch-set at 3:53 PM. That's why it's missed in [PATCH v4 1/4].
The tag would be added in next version.

Best Regards
Richard Zhu