Re: [PATCH v1] futex: Use-after-free between futex_key_to_node_opt and vma_replace_policy

[Hao-Yu Yang]

On Fri, Mar 13, 2026 at 01:26:21PM +0100, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 13, 2026 at 1:08 PM Hao-Yu Yang <naup96721@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > During futex_key_to_node_opt() execution, vma->vm_policy is read under
> > speculative mmap lock and RCU. Concurrently, mbind() may call
> > vma_replace_policy() which frees the old mempolicy immediately via
> > kmem_cache_free().
> >
> > This creates a race where __futex_key_to_node() dereferences a freed
> > mempolicy pointer, causing a use-after-free read of mpol->mode.
> >
> > patch just initial attempt to patch and need more discussion.
> > I think we need to remove this path or add some lock.
> >
> > Fixes: c042c505210d ("futex: Implement FUTEX2_MPOL")
> > Reported-by: Hao-Yu Yang <naup96721@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Hao-Yu Yang <naup96721@xxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  kernel/futex/core.c | 23 -----------------------
> >  1 file changed, 23 deletions(-)
> 
> Good catch !
> 
> Adding rcu to __mpol_put() is really a no brainer.
> 
>  Thanks.
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/mempolicy.h b/include/linux/mempolicy.h
> index 0fe96f3ab3ef02e902e1676e750c2006ecd6147f..65c732d440d2f4e4566204429f1e5e7487ab8f91
> 100644
> --- a/include/linux/mempolicy.h
> +++ b/include/linux/mempolicy.h
> @@ -55,6 +55,7 @@ struct mempolicy {
>                 nodemask_t cpuset_mems_allowed; /* relative to these nodes */
>                 nodemask_t user_nodemask;       /* nodemask passed by user */
>         } w;
> +       struct rcu_head rcu;
>  };
> 
>  /*
> diff --git a/mm/mempolicy.c b/mm/mempolicy.c
> index 0e5175f1c767d81394276559b9610c24d854f5bc..6dc61a3d4a32f74a06bf005acfd82d4a43112348
> 100644
> --- a/mm/mempolicy.c
> +++ b/mm/mempolicy.c
> @@ -487,7 +487,7 @@ void __mpol_put(struct mempolicy *pol)
>  {
>         if (!atomic_dec_and_test(&pol->refcnt))
>                 return;
> -       kmem_cache_free(policy_cache, pol);
> +       kfree_rcu(pol, rcu);
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_FOR_MODULES(__mpol_put, "kvm");

Thanks for your review. I have send patch2. If this patch is good. I will cc to stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx