[PATCH 4/4] ocfs2: remove redundant l_next_free_rec check in __ocfs2_find_path()

[Joseph Qi]

The l_next_free_rec > l_count check after ocfs2_read_extent_block() in
__ocfs2_find_path() is now redundant, as ocfs2_validate_extent_block()
already performs this validation at block read time.

Remove the duplicate check to avoid maintaining the same validation in
two places.

Signed-off-by: Joseph Qi <joseph.qi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 fs/ocfs2/alloc.c | 12 ------------
 1 file changed, 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/alloc.c b/fs/ocfs2/alloc.c
index 8639806bcbb8..08e137928080 100644
--- a/fs/ocfs2/alloc.c
+++ b/fs/ocfs2/alloc.c
@@ -1878,18 +1878,6 @@ static int __ocfs2_find_path(struct ocfs2_caching_info *ci,
 		eb = (struct ocfs2_extent_block *) bh->b_data;
 		el = &eb->h_list;
 
-		if (le16_to_cpu(el->l_next_free_rec) >
-		    le16_to_cpu(el->l_count)) {
-			ocfs2_error(ocfs2_metadata_cache_get_super(ci),
-				    "Owner %llu has bad count in extent list at block %llu (next free=%u, count=%u)\n",
-				    (unsigned long long)ocfs2_metadata_cache_owner(ci),
-				    (unsigned long long)bh->b_blocknr,
-				    le16_to_cpu(el->l_next_free_rec),
-				    le16_to_cpu(el->l_count));
-			ret = -EROFS;
-			goto out;
-		}
-
 		if (func)
 			func(data, bh);
 	}
-- 
2.39.3