Re: linux-next: manual merge of the fs-next tree with the mm-nonmm-unstable tree

[Mark Brown]

On Tue, Apr 07, 2026 at 10:19:59AM +0800, Joseph Qi wrote:
> On 4/7/26 12:25 AM, Andrew Morton wrote:

> > Thanks.  That's a nasty-looking conflict due to the applying order.  The
> > 0b2600f81cefc change is actually small, below.

> > Hopefully Linus can figure it out ;)

> Should I resend the series base on the latest linux-next?

Definitely don't do that, things sent to Linus should be based on his
tree only - basing on -next will pull in far too much stuff.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature