[RFC PATCH 2/3] LoongArch: BPF: Inline bpf_get_current_task{_btf}() helpers

From: Tiezhu Yang

Date: Tue Apr 28 2026 - 03:34:10 EST


The pointer to task_struct is always available in the $tp register,
the calls to bpf_get_current_task() and bpf_get_current_task_btf()
can be inlined into a single move instruction.

(1) Here is the sample test.c:

#include <linux/bpf.h>
#include <bpf/bpf_helpers.h>

SEC("raw_tp/sys_enter")
long test_task(void *ctx)
{
return (long)bpf_get_current_task();
}
char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";

(2) Here are the test steps:

sudo yum install libbpf-devel kernel-devel bpftool
clang -target bpf -O2 -c test.c -o test.o
sudo sysctl -w net.core.bpf_jit_enable=1
sudo bpftool prog show name test_task
sudo rm -f /sys/fs/bpf/test_task
sudo bpftool prog load test.o /sys/fs/bpf/test_task
ID=$(sudo bpftool prog show pinned /sys/fs/bpf/test_task | grep -oE '^[0-9]+')
sudo bpftool prog dump jited id $ID

(3) Here are the test results:

Before: 6 instructions

...
64: lu12i.w $t1, 1093
68: ori $t1, $t1, 3320
6c: lu32i.d $t1, 0
70: lu52i.d $t1, $t1, -1792
74: jirl $ra, $t1, 0
78: move $a5, $a0
...

After: 1 instruction

...
64: move $a5, $tp
...

This is similar with commit 2bb138cb20a6 ("bpf, arm64: Inline
bpf_get_current_task/_btf() helpers").

Signed-off-by: Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---
arch/loongarch/net/bpf_jit.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 18 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/loongarch/net/bpf_jit.c b/arch/loongarch/net/bpf_jit.c
index 24913dc7f4e8..b93b67d22c26 100644
--- a/arch/loongarch/net/bpf_jit.c
+++ b/arch/loongarch/net/bpf_jit.c
@@ -1147,6 +1147,13 @@ static int build_insn(const struct bpf_insn *insn, struct jit_ctx *ctx, bool ext

/* function call */
case BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL:
+ /* Implement helper call to bpf_get_current_task/_btf() inline */
+ if (insn->src_reg == 0 && (insn->imm == BPF_FUNC_get_current_task ||
+ insn->imm == BPF_FUNC_get_current_task_btf)) {
+ move_reg(ctx, regmap[BPF_REG_0], LOONGARCH_GPR_TP);
+ break;
+ }
+
ret = bpf_jit_get_func_addr(ctx->prog, insn, extra_pass,
&func_addr, &func_addr_fixed);
if (ret < 0)
@@ -2367,3 +2374,14 @@ bool bpf_jit_supports_subprog_tailcalls(void)
{
return true;
}
+
+bool bpf_jit_inlines_helper_call(s32 imm)
+{
+ switch (imm) {
+ case BPF_FUNC_get_current_task:
+ case BPF_FUNC_get_current_task_btf:
+ return true;
+ default:
+ return false;
+ }
+}
--
2.42.0