Re: [PATCH net-next 1/4] net: eth: fbnic: Fix addr validation in pcs write

[Mike Marciniszyn]

On Tue, Apr 28, 2026 at 08:11:30PM +0200, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 28, 2026 at 01:28:07PM -0400, mike.marciniszyn@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
> > From: "Mike Marciniszyn (Meta)" <mike.marciniszyn@xxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > This patch contains a fix for addr validation in fbnic_mdio_write_pcs().
> >
> > Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Fixes: d0ce9fd7eae0 ("fbnic: Add SW shim for MDIO interface to PMD and PCS")
> > Signed-off-by: Mike Marciniszyn (Meta) <mike.marciniszyn@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> Please don't mix fixed and going development work in one
> patchset. They should be applied to different trees, etc.
>
> https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/maintainer-netdev.html
>
>     Andrew
>

So I'm guessing I need to send the bug fix to net instead of net-next
and reissue the patch series?

BTW, the review notes that the patch wasn't sent to you
(https://netdev-ctrl.bots.linux.dev/logs/build/1087030/14544928/cc_maintainers/)
but that is because there are two addresses for you:

grep Lunn MAINTAINERS
M:      Andrew Lunn <andrew@xxxxxxx>
M:      Andrew Lunn <andrew@xxxxxxx>
M:      Andrew Lunn <andrew@xxxxxxx>
M:      Andrew Lunn <andrew@xxxxxxx>
M:      Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@xxxxxxx> <----
M:      Andrew Lunn <andrew@xxxxxxx>
M:      Andrew Lunn <andrew@xxxxxxx>
M:      Andrew Lunn <andrew@xxxxxxx>
M:      Andrew Lunn <andrew@xxxxxxx>

That seems to foil my scripting.  Is MAINTAINERS wrong?

Mike