Re: [PATCH] iio: buffer: hw-consumer: fix use-after-free in error path

[Andy Shevchenko]

On Wed, Apr 29, 2026 at 05:00:08PM +0000, Roman Gushchin wrote:
> Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
> > On Tue, Apr 28, 2026 at 11:34:22AM -0700, Roman Gushchin wrote:
> >> > On Apr 28, 2026, at 11:26 AM, Jonathan Cameron <jic23@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> > On Tue, 28 Apr 2026 18:59:28 +0300
> >> > Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

...

> >> >> I am also wondering should we put Reported-by with the reference to AI somehow?
> >> >> Jonathan, others, what are your opinions?
> >> > 
> >> > Would be nice to do so for these - things noticed whilst reviewing a patch
> >> > type reports.
> >> > 
> >> > Roman (+CC), any suggestions on how to do this?
> >> 
> >> I appreciate when people are recognizing Sashiko, but I don’t have any strong
> >> preference.  Many engineers are using it locally before sending patches
> >> upstream, so we’ll never know it anyway. But Reported-by/Assisted-by tags are
> >> appreciated when appropriate.
> >
> > The problem is what to put to Reported-by as an email. For example LKP bot or
> > syzbot have dedicated emails for that. What about Sashiko?
> 
> We have sashiko-bot@xxxxxxxxxx !

Good to know, thanks.

> > P.S.
> > An offtopic, how can I be email notified on the reviews done by Sashiko against
> > my patches sent to Linux kernel project (mailing lists)? If you can add me
> > as andy@xxxxxxxxxx, I appreciate that!
> 
> I don't have a personal opt-in at the moment,

Whenever it appears (I hope to see it rather sooner) put me first in the list
to be Cc'ed!

> it's configurable per
> mailing list. The current configuration is here:
> https://github.com/sashiko-dev/sashiko/blob/main/sashiko.dev/email_policy.toml
> 
> I generally rely on the consensus decision by corresponding maintainers.

Noted, thanks for clarification.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko