Re: (subset) [PATCH v3 00/14] Remove redundant rcu_read_lock/unlock() in spin_lock

[Jeff Johnson]

On Tue, 16 Sep 2025 12:47:21 +0800, pengdonglin wrote:
> Since commit a8bb74acd8efe ("rcu: Consolidate RCU-sched update-side function definitions")
> there is no difference between rcu_read_lock(), rcu_read_lock_bh() and
> rcu_read_lock_sched() in terms of RCU read section and the relevant grace
> period. That means that spin_lock(), which implies rcu_read_lock_sched(),
> also implies rcu_read_lock().
> 
> There is no need no explicitly start a RCU read section if one has already
> been started implicitly by spin_lock().
> 
> [...]

Applied, thanks!

[14/14] wifi: ath9k: Remove redundant rcu_read_lock/unlock() in spin_lock
        commit: c4f518736472c8cfbf1d304e01c631babd2bbf34

Best regards,
-- 
Jeff Johnson <jeff.johnson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>