Re: [PATCH v3 3/5] rust: io: use the `bitfield!` macro in `register!`

[Yury Norov]

On Fri, May 01, 2026 at 08:19:31PM +0200, Danilo Krummrich wrote:
> On Fri May 1, 2026 at 7:47 PM CEST, Yury Norov wrote:
> > If it comes to another round, maybe split switching to a bitfields and
> > getting rid of the bitfield_core? For maintainability reasons.
> 
> I'm happy to take it as a single patch -- the deleted rules are dead code the
> moment the switch happens, and the code is local to the same macro, so the
> intermediate state doesn't seem to add any value, or structure in terms of
> touching different components etc.
> 
> Did you have anything specific in mind when you mention maintainability reasons?

I only mean that if there will be weird regression found in the new
implementation, it's better to be able to revert just a single patch
to restore the original code with no side effects.

Just a suggestion. If you're happy with this, I'm happy as well.