Re: [PATCH v1] docs: housekeeping: Fix struct member access in code example

[Jonathan Corbet]

Costa Shulyupin <costa.shul@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> No such array housekeeping_cpumasks
>
> Fix to housekeeping.cpumasks.
>
> Signed-off-by: Costa Shulyupin <costa.shul@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  Documentation/core-api/housekeeping.rst | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/core-api/housekeeping.rst b/Documentation/core-api/housekeeping.rst
> index 92c6e53cea75..ccb0a88b9cb3 100644
> --- a/Documentation/core-api/housekeeping.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/core-api/housekeeping.rst
> @@ -99,7 +99,7 @@ the same RCU read side critical section.
>  A typical layout example would look like this on the update side
>  (``housekeeping_update()``)::
>  
> -	rcu_assign_pointer(housekeeping_cpumasks[type], trial);
> +	rcu_assign_pointer(housekeeping.cpumasks[type], trial);
>  	synchronize_rcu();

This looks actively wrong to me.  I think it should be:

  housekeeping_cpumask(type)

... Frederic ... ?

jon