Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] Cleanup Linux Watchdog documentation

[Guenter Roeck]

On 5/4/26 06:49, Philipp Hahn wrote:
> From: Philipp Hahn <phahn-oss@xxxxxx>
>
> Hello,
>
> while reading the documentation on the Linux kernel watchdog
> subsystem[1] I noticed some strange looking formatting: `struct`s are
> detected automatically by Sphinx and the word **after** it is considered
> the name of the structure, but the watchdog documentation puts the name
> **before** the word `struct`; this leads to the wrong word being
> emphasized.
>
> Also reorganize the index page to better separate the documentation on
> generic infrastructure from specific drivers – which are mostly obsolete
> and relevant for historic documentation only.
>
> Please apply; thank you for all your work.
>
> Philipp
>
> [1]: https://docs.kernel.org/watchdog/convert_drivers_to_kernel_api.html

From Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst:

  However, for a multi-patch series, it is generally
  best to avoid using In-Reply-To: to link to older versions of the
  series.  This way multiple versions of the patch don't become an
  unmanageable forest of references in email clients.

... but you did that anyway. It also almost guarantees that new
versions of a patch series get lost.

Guenter