Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] counter: add GPIO-based quadrature encoder driver

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

On 01/05/2026 22:07, Wadim Mueller wrote:
> +
> +static int gpio_qenc_count_read(struct counter_device *counter,
> +				struct counter_count *count, u64 *val)
> +{
> +	struct gpio_qenc_priv *priv = counter_priv(counter);
> +	unsigned long flags;
> +
> +	spin_lock_irqsave(&priv->lock, flags);
> +	*val = (u64)priv->count;
> +	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&priv->lock, flags);
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int gpio_qenc_count_write(struct counter_device *counter,
> +				 struct counter_count *count, const u64 val)

Please don't continue this broken 'const scalar' pattern. You probably
copied this code, but no such new code should be ever added.

It's not necessary - compiler/preprocessor does not care from function
signature point of view. It's not helping - it's scalar and no sane code
modifies such argument, thus there is no single need to protect it. It's
not making code easier to read. Quite opposite: raises eyebrows for no
real reason.

Same in few other places.

Best regards,
Krzysztof