Re: linux-next: omission of the nfc tree

[David Heidelberg]

Hello Thierry,

sorry about that, should be fixed (rebased against -rc2 now).

Is there strong insensitive to use -rc1? In case it causing additional work, I 
can stick with rc1.

David

On 04/05/2026 22:50, Thierry Reding wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the nfc tree got a conflict in a bunch of
> files. It looks like you based this tree on next-20260430 and this
> causes a bunch of old trees being pulled into today's linux next and
> that results in a lot of conflicts.
>
> Your for-next branch should always be based on -rc1 or some later -rc
> if there's a need. It should *never* be based on a previous linux-next
> build.
>
> I'm omitting the nfc tree today. Please fix this so that the tree can
> be included in linux-next.
>
> Thanks,
> Thierry

--
David Heidelberg