[PATCH] power: supply: cros_charge-control: Move MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE next to the table itself

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

By convention MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE() immediately follows the ID table it
exports, because this is easier to read and verify.  It also makes more
sense since #ifdef for ACPI or OF could hide both of them.

Most of the privers already have this correctly placed, so adjust
the missing ones.  No functional impact.

Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 drivers/power/supply/cros_charge-control.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/power/supply/cros_charge-control.c b/drivers/power/supply/cros_charge-control.c
index 53e6a77e03fc..6a5e54218178 100644
--- a/drivers/power/supply/cros_charge-control.c
+++ b/drivers/power/supply/cros_charge-control.c
@@ -323,6 +323,7 @@ static const struct platform_device_id cros_chctl_id[] = {
 	{ "cros-charge-control", 0 },
 	{}
 };
+MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(platform, cros_chctl_id);
 
 static struct platform_driver cros_chctl_driver = {
 	.driver.name	= "cros-charge-control",
@@ -331,7 +332,6 @@ static struct platform_driver cros_chctl_driver = {
 };
 module_platform_driver(cros_chctl_driver);
 
-MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(platform, cros_chctl_id);
 MODULE_DESCRIPTION("ChromeOS EC charge control");
 MODULE_AUTHOR("Thomas Weißschuh <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>");
 MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
-- 
2.51.0