Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] dt-bindings: wire style checker into dt_binding_check

[Rob Herring]

On Wed, Apr 29, 2026 at 03:21:33PM +0100, Daniel Golle wrote:
> Run dt-check-style as part of dt_binding_check_one. The recipe wraps
> the tool with scripts/jobserver-exec so worker count follows the GNU
> make jobserver -- `make -j N dt_binding_check` constrains the checker
> to N workers rather than spawning one per CPU.
> 
> Default mode (relaxed) is zero-violation on the current tree, so this
> does not introduce new warnings into make dt_binding_check. Stricter
> rules are available via --mode=strict (eg. for use by checkpatch.pl in
> a future series).
> 
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Golle <daniel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> Changes since v1:
>  - dropped xargs -n200 -P$(nproc) sharding; single Python invocation
>    with file list via @argfile
>  - dropped `|| true`: relaxed mode is zero-output today

Just to make sure, when there is a warning added, we don't want to error 
out the build. Because they will sneak in.

>  - wrapped under scripts/jobserver-exec so worker count follows the
>    make jobserver
> 
>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/Makefile | 20 ++++++++++++++++++--
>  1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/Makefile b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/Makefile
> index 7b668f7fd400..35ddd0b7a349 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/Makefile
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/Makefile
> @@ -46,6 +46,19 @@ quiet_cmd_chk_bindings = CHKDT   $(src)
>  			  xargs -n200 -P$$(nproc) $(DT_DOC_CHECKER) -u $(src)) \
>  			  && touch $@ || true
>  
> +DT_CHK_STYLE = $(srctree)/scripts/dtc/dt-check-style
> +
> +# Feed the file list to the checker via @argfile in a single Python
> +# process so the ruamel.yaml import is paid once. scripts/jobserver-exec
> +# claims slots from the GNU make jobserver and exposes the count via
> +# $PARALLELISM, which dt-check-style picks up to size its worker pool.
> +quiet_cmd_chk_style = STYLE   $(src)
> +      cmd_chk_style = f=$$(mktemp) && $(find_cmd) > $$f && \
> +		      $(PYTHON3) $(srctree)/scripts/jobserver-exec \
> +		      $(PYTHON3) $(DT_CHK_STYLE) @$$f; \

What's the reason to run via PYTHON3 vs. running dt-check-style 
directly? It's just different from the rest of this makefile.

> +		      r=$$?; rm -f $$f; \
> +		      if [ $$r -eq 0 ]; then touch $@; else exit $$r; fi
> +
>  quiet_cmd_mk_schema = SCHEMA  $@
>        cmd_mk_schema = f=$$(mktemp) ; \
>                        $(find_all_cmd) > $$f ; \
> @@ -62,13 +75,16 @@ override DTC_FLAGS := \
>  $(obj)/processed-schema.json: $(DT_DOCS) check_dtschema_version FORCE
>  	$(call if_changed,mk_schema)
>  
> -targets += .dt-binding.checked .yamllint.checked
> +targets += .dt-binding.checked .yamllint.checked .dt-style.checked
>  $(obj)/.yamllint.checked: $(DT_DOCS) $(src)/.yamllint FORCE
>  	$(if $(DT_SCHEMA_LINT),$(call if_changed,yamllint),)
>  
>  $(obj)/.dt-binding.checked: $(DT_DOCS) FORCE
>  	$(call if_changed,chk_bindings)
>  
> +$(obj)/.dt-style.checked: $(DT_DOCS) FORCE
> +	$(call if_changed,chk_style)
> +
>  always-y += processed-schema.json
>  targets += $(patsubst $(obj)/%,%, $(CHK_DT_EXAMPLES))
>  targets += $(patsubst $(obj)/%.dtb,%.dts, $(CHK_DT_EXAMPLES))
> @@ -82,7 +98,7 @@ dt_compatible_check: $(obj)/processed-schema.json
>  	$(Q)$(srctree)/scripts/dtc/dt-extract-compatibles $(srctree) | xargs dt-check-compatible -v -s $<
>  
>  PHONY += dt_binding_check_one
> -dt_binding_check_one: $(obj)/.dt-binding.checked $(obj)/.yamllint.checked
> +dt_binding_check_one: $(obj)/.dt-binding.checked $(obj)/.yamllint.checked $(obj)/.dt-style.checked
>  
>  PHONY += dt_binding_check
>  dt_binding_check: dt_binding_check_one $(CHK_DT_EXAMPLES)
> -- 
> 2.54.0