Re: [PATCH v12 2/5] mm/vmalloc: use physical page count for vrealloc() grow-in-place check

[Uladzislau Rezki]

On Thu, May 07, 2026 at 01:13:35AM +0530, Shivam Kalra wrote:
> On 07/05/26 00:17, Uladzislau Rezki wrote:
> > Maybe we should consider Fujunjie approach and borrow his idea to shrink VA also?
> > In that case, we do not need to switch to vm->nr_pages? And we do not
> > need
> > 
> > [PATCH v12 3/5] mm/vmalloc: use physical page count in vread_iter()
> > 
> > ?
> > 
> > --
> > Uladzislau Rezki
> I didn't want to change the va in this patch series and wanted to keep
> it simple.
> If we change the va, we will also need to rebalance the rb tree.
> I can work on a followup patch series if VA space pressure is critical.
>
Actually it is not critical. The idea is if we shrink VA then we do not
need care much about the size thus keeping vread_iter() unchanged as
well as [PATCH v12 2/5]? at least partly.

I am find with it anyway.

Reviewed-by: Uladzislau Rezki (Sony) <urezki@xxxxxxxxx>

--
Uladzislau Rezki