Re: [PATCH 1/2] [RFC] debugobjects: avoid gcc-16.0.1 section mismatch

[Heiko Carstens]

On Tue, Feb 03, 2026 at 05:23:59PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
> 
> gcc-16 has gained some more advanced inlining techniques that enable
> it to inline the is_static_object() function pointer into a specialized
> version of lookup_object_or_alloc:
> 
> WARNING: modpost: vmlinux: section mismatch in reference: lookup_object_or_alloc.part.0+0x1ac (section: .text) -> is_static_object (section: .init.text)
> 
> >From what I can tell, the transformation is correct, as this
> is only called when lookup_object_or_alloc() is called from
> debug_objects_selftest(), which is also __init.
> 
> I have not come up with a good workaround, so this simply marks
> is_static_object() as not __init. Since there are currently only two
> files where this happens, that may be an easy way out.
> 
> If anyone has a better idea for how to deal with that, let me know!
> 
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  lib/debugobjects.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

FWIW, I'm seeing this now on s390 with gcc-16 too (debug_defconfig).

> diff --git a/lib/debugobjects.c b/lib/debugobjects.c
> index 89a1d6745dc2..056957c4e52f 100644
> --- a/lib/debugobjects.c
> +++ b/lib/debugobjects.c
> @@ -1195,7 +1195,7 @@ struct self_test {
>  
>  static __initconst const struct debug_obj_descr descr_type_test;
>  
> -static bool __init is_static_object(void *addr)
> +static bool is_static_object(void *addr)
>  {
>  	struct self_test *obj = addr;
>  
> -- 
> 2.39.5
>