Re: [PATCH v3 05/12] mm, swap: unify large folio allocation
From: David Hildenbrand (Arm)
Date: Mon May 11 2026 - 08:58:11 EST
On 4/21/26 08:16, Kairui Song via B4 Relay wrote:
> From: Kairui Song <kasong@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Now that direct large order allocation is supported in the swap cache,
> both anon and shmem can use it instead of implementing their own methods.
> This unifies the fallback and swap cache check, which also reduces the
> TOCTOU race window of swap cache state: previously, high order swapin
> required checking swap cache states first, then allocating and falling
> back separately. Now all these steps happen in the same compact loop.
>
> Order fallback and statistics are also unified, callers just need to
> check and pass the acceptable order bitmask.
>
> There is basically no behavior change. This only makes things more
> unified and prepares for later commits. Cgroup and zero map checks can
> also be moved into the compact loop, further reducing race windows and
> redundancy
>
You should spell out the rename from swapin_folio() to swapin_entry() [and why
it is done].
swapin_readahead() vs. swapin_entry() looks a bit odd, fiven that both consume
an entry.
> Signed-off-by: Kairui Song <kasong@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> mm/memory.c | 77 ++++++------------------------
> mm/shmem.c | 94 +++++++++---------------------------
> mm/swap.h | 30 ++----------
> mm/swap_state.c | 145 ++++++++++----------------------------------------------
> mm/swapfile.c | 3 +-
> 5 files changed, 67 insertions(+), 282 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/memory.c b/mm/memory.c
> index ea6568571131..404734a5bcff 100644
> --- a/mm/memory.c
> +++ b/mm/memory.c
> @@ -4593,26 +4593,6 @@ static vm_fault_t handle_pte_marker(struct vm_fault *vmf)
> return VM_FAULT_SIGBUS;
> }
>
> -static struct folio *__alloc_swap_folio(struct vm_fault *vmf)
> -{
> - struct vm_area_struct *vma = vmf->vma;
> - struct folio *folio;
> - softleaf_t entry;
> -
> - folio = vma_alloc_folio(GFP_HIGHUSER_MOVABLE, 0, vma, vmf->address);
> - if (!folio)
> - return NULL;
> -
> - entry = softleaf_from_pte(vmf->orig_pte);
> - if (mem_cgroup_swapin_charge_folio(folio, vma->vm_mm,
> - GFP_KERNEL, entry)) {
> - folio_put(folio);
> - return NULL;
> - }
> -
> - return folio;
> -}
> -
> #ifdef CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE
> /*
> * Check if the PTEs within a range are contiguous swap entries
> @@ -4642,8 +4622,6 @@ static bool can_swapin_thp(struct vm_fault *vmf, pte_t *ptep, int nr_pages)
> */
> if (unlikely(swap_zeromap_batch(entry, nr_pages, NULL) != nr_pages))
> return false;
> - if (unlikely(non_swapcache_batch(entry, nr_pages) != nr_pages))
> - return false;
>
This should also be pointed out in the patch description. (and why it is ok)
> return true;
> }
> @@ -4671,16 +4649,14 @@ static inline unsigned long thp_swap_suitable_orders(pgoff_t swp_offset,
> return orders;
> }
>
> -static struct folio *alloc_swap_folio(struct vm_fault *vmf)
> +static unsigned long thp_swapin_suitable_orders(struct vm_fault *vmf)
> {
> struct vm_area_struct *vma = vmf->vma;
> unsigned long orders;
> - struct folio *folio;
> unsigned long addr;
> softleaf_t entry;
> spinlock_t *ptl;
> pte_t *pte;
> - gfp_t gfp;
> int order;
>
> /*
> @@ -4688,7 +4664,7 @@ static struct folio *alloc_swap_folio(struct vm_fault *vmf)
> * maintain the uffd semantics.
> */
> if (unlikely(userfaultfd_armed(vma)))
> - goto fallback;
> + return 0;
>
> /*
> * A large swapped out folio could be partially or fully in zswap. We
> @@ -4696,7 +4672,7 @@ static struct folio *alloc_swap_folio(struct vm_fault *vmf)
> * folio.
> */
> if (!zswap_never_enabled())
> - goto fallback;
> + return 0;
>
> entry = softleaf_from_pte(vmf->orig_pte);
> /*
> @@ -4710,12 +4686,12 @@ static struct folio *alloc_swap_folio(struct vm_fault *vmf)
> vmf->address, orders);
>
> if (!orders)
> - goto fallback;
> + return 0;
>
> pte = pte_offset_map_lock(vmf->vma->vm_mm, vmf->pmd,
> vmf->address & PMD_MASK, &ptl);
> if (unlikely(!pte))
> - goto fallback;
> + return 0;
>
> /*
> * For do_swap_page, find the highest order where the aligned range is
> @@ -4731,29 +4707,12 @@ static struct folio *alloc_swap_folio(struct vm_fault *vmf)
>
> pte_unmap_unlock(pte, ptl);
>
> - /* Try allocating the highest of the remaining orders. */
> - gfp = vma_thp_gfp_mask(vma);
> - while (orders) {
> - addr = ALIGN_DOWN(vmf->address, PAGE_SIZE << order);
> - folio = vma_alloc_folio(gfp, order, vma, addr);
> - if (folio) {
> - if (!mem_cgroup_swapin_charge_folio(folio, vma->vm_mm,
> - gfp, entry))
> - return folio;
> - count_mthp_stat(order, MTHP_STAT_SWPIN_FALLBACK_CHARGE);
> - folio_put(folio);
> - }
> - count_mthp_stat(order, MTHP_STAT_SWPIN_FALLBACK);
> - order = next_order(&orders, order);
> - }
> -
> -fallback:
> - return __alloc_swap_folio(vmf);
> + return orders;
> }
> #else /* !CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE */
> -static struct folio *alloc_swap_folio(struct vm_fault *vmf)
> +static unsigned long thp_swapin_suitable_orders(struct vm_fault *vmf)
> {
> - return __alloc_swap_folio(vmf);
> + return 0;
> }
> #endif /* CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE */
>
> @@ -4859,21 +4818,13 @@ vm_fault_t do_swap_page(struct vm_fault *vmf)
> if (folio)
> swap_update_readahead(folio, vma, vmf->address);
> if (!folio) {
> - if (data_race(si->flags & SWP_SYNCHRONOUS_IO)) {
> - folio = alloc_swap_folio(vmf);
> - if (folio) {
> - /*
> - * folio is charged, so swapin can only fail due
> - * to raced swapin and return NULL.
> - */
> - swapcache = swapin_folio(entry, folio);
> - if (swapcache != folio)
> - folio_put(folio);
> - folio = swapcache;
> - }
> - } else {
> + /* Swapin bypasses readahead for SWP_SYNCHRONOUS_IO devices */
> + if (data_race(si->flags & SWP_SYNCHRONOUS_IO))
> + folio = swapin_entry(entry, GFP_HIGHUSER_MOVABLE,
> + thp_swapin_suitable_orders(vmf),
> + vmf, NULL, 0);
> + else
> folio = swapin_readahead(entry, GFP_HIGHUSER_MOVABLE, vmf);
> - }
>
> if (!folio) {
> /*
Nothing else jumped at me in memory.c
--
Cheers,
David