Re: [PATCH resend v6 10/30] mm: alloc_swap_folio: pass raw fault address to vma_alloc_folio

[Gregory Price]

On Mon, May 11, 2026 at 05:41:16PM -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Mon, May 11, 2026 at 12:05:18PM -0400, Gregory Price wrote:
> > On Mon, May 11, 2026 at 05:02:39AM -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > Same change as the previous patch but for alloc_swap_folio:
> > > pass vmf->address directly instead of ALIGN_DOWN(vmf->address, ...).
> > > 
> > 
> > Starting to seem like this should all just get squashed into once patch.
> > 
> > ~Gregory
> 
> I mean I was told the patches are too big and too hard to review.
> It's just same, independent changes made in several places.
> Does it matter if they are squashed or not?
>

Mostly i think the ordering of the patches thrashes from one set
(alignment) to another set (USER_ADDR_NONE).  If all of one set was
pulled ahead of the other then it would be easier to follow.

This particular set seemed trivial enough to just be one patch, but i
don't think it matters all that much.

~Gregory