Re: [PATCH 0/7] Accelerate page migration with batch copying and hardware offload

[Huang, Ying]

"David Hildenbrand (Arm)" <david@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:

>>> ---------------
>>>
>>> 1. Should the batch path run without a registered migrator? Patches 1-4
>>>    are self-contained and use folios_mc_copy() (CPU). I have several
>>>    options like making batch path always-on for eligible folios, or
>>>    giving admin an option to flip the static branch, or keep the gate.
>>>    I'm leaning toward always-on.
>>>
>>> 2. Carrying already_copied via folio->migrate_info vs changing the
>>>    migrate_folio() callback signature (Huang, Ying). I went with the
>>>    field for now to avoid touching every fs callback before the design
>>>    settles. Happy to revisit.
>> 
>> Personally, I still prefer to change migrate_folio() callbacks for
>> better readability.
>
> Can that be added as a cleanup on top?

It sounds good to me.

---
Best Regards,
Huang, Ying