RE: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH iwl-next v1 1/2] igb: use napi_schedule_irqoff() instead of napi_schedule()

[Rinitha, SX]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Intel-wired-lan <intel-wired-lan-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx> On Behalf Of Daiki Harada
> Sent: 31 March 2026 16:09
> To: intel-wired-lan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Cc: Nguyen, Anthony L <anthony.l.nguyen@xxxxxxxxx>; Kitszel, Przemyslaw <przemyslaw.kitszel@xxxxxxxxx>; Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@xxxxxxx>; David S. Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Eric Dumazet <edumazet@xxxxxxxxxx>; Jakub Kicinski <kuba@xxxxxxxxxx>; Paolo Abeni <pabeni@xxxxxxxxxx>; Daiki Harada <daiky0325@xxxxxxxxx>; Kohei Enju <kohei@xxxxxxxx>
> Subject: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH iwl-next v1 1/2] igb: use napi_schedule_irqoff() instead of napi_schedule()
>
> Replace napi_schedule() with napi_schedule_irqoff() in the interrupt handler path in igb driver
>
> Tested on QEMU with igb NIC emulation (-nic user,model=igb)
>
> Suggested-by: Kohei Enju <kohei@xxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Daiki Harada <daiky0325@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c | 6 +++---
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>

Tested-by: Rinitha S <sx.rinitha@xxxxxxxxx> (A Contingent worker at Intel)