Re: [PATCH] docs: reporting-issues: clarify advice wording

[Thorsten Leemhuis]

On 5/12/26 17:04, Chen-Shi-Hong wrote:
> A previous change

You mean the one you sent earlier we discussed? But that was not
applied, unless I'm missing something. So this should have been a v2 of
your patch (which a changelog) and against the same base (the one that
"these advices"). You want to send that as v3 now.

> replaced "these advices" with "this advice", but that
> wording can be read too narrowly and may seem to refer only to a single
> recommendation.
> 
> Use "all of this advice" instead

That's great, thx. And thx to Jonathan for the suggestion!

Ciao, Thorsten

> to make it clearer that the sentence
> refers to the broader set of recommendations in the paragraph.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Chen-Shi-Hong <eric039eric@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  Documentation/admin-guide/reporting-issues.rst | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/admin-guide/reporting-issues.rst b/Documentation/admin-guide/reporting-issues.rst
> index 731865b5e8ff..87dd874fffcf 100644
> --- a/Documentation/admin-guide/reporting-issues.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/admin-guide/reporting-issues.rst
> @@ -129,7 +129,7 @@ After these preparations you'll now enter the main part:
>     situations; during the merge window that actually might be even the best
>     approach, but in that development phase it can be an even better idea to
>     suspend your efforts for a few days anyway. Whatever version you choose,
> -   ideally use a 'vanilla' build. Ignoring this advice will dramatically
> +   ideally use a 'vanilla' build. Ignoring all of this advice will dramatically
>     increase the risk your report will be rejected or ignored.
>  
>   * Ensure the kernel you just installed does not 'taint' itself when
> @@ -795,7 +795,7 @@ Install a fresh kernel for testing
>      situations; during the merge window that actually might be even the best
>      approach, but in that development phase it can be an even better idea to
>      suspend your efforts for a few days anyway. Whatever version you choose,
> -    ideally use a 'vanilla' built. Ignoring this advice will dramatically
> +    ideally use a 'vanilla' built. Ignoring all of this advice will dramatically
>      increase the risk your report will be rejected or ignored.*
>  
>  As mentioned in the detailed explanation for the first step already: Like most