Re: [PATCH v4] mm: introduce a new page type for page pool in page type
From: Byungchul Park
Date: Wed May 13 2026 - 09:48:49 EST
On Wed, May 13, 2026 at 03:02:43PM +0200, David Hildenbrand (Arm) wrote:
> On 5/13/26 14:39, Byungchul Park wrote:
> > On Wed, May 13, 2026 at 02:29:46PM +0200, David Hildenbrand (Arm) wrote:
> > On 5/13/26 14:18, Byungchul Park wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> The problem comes from the fact that page_type and _mapcount are
> >>> union'ed but there is a case where these two information should be kept
> >>> at the same time.
> >>>
> >>> Why don't we allow these two information can be kept in the 4 bytes at
> >>> the same time until Zi Yan's work on _mapcount and page_type will be
> >>> done, instead of taking a step back?
> >>>
> >>> It can be more optimized but I suggest the approach I just mentioned:
> >>> ---
> >>> diff --git a/fs/proc/internal.h b/fs/proc/internal.h
> >>> index 64dc44832808..e5ec204866dc 100644
> >>> --- a/fs/proc/internal.h
> >>> +++ b/fs/proc/internal.h
> >>> @@ -185,8 +185,7 @@ static inline int folio_precise_page_mapcount(struct folio *folio,
> >>> {
> >>> int mapcount = atomic_read(&page->_mapcount) + 1;
> >>>
> >>> - if (page_mapcount_is_type(mapcount))
> >>> - mapcount = 0;
> >>> + mapcount = page_mapcount_clear_type(mapcount);
> >>> if (folio_test_large(folio))
> >>> mapcount += folio_entire_mapcount(folio);
> >>>
> >>> diff --git a/include/linux/mm.h b/include/linux/mm.h
> >>> index 8260e28205e9..f45064796313 100644
> >>> --- a/include/linux/mm.h
> >>> +++ b/include/linux/mm.h
> >>> @@ -1865,8 +1865,7 @@ static inline int folio_mapcount(const struct folio *folio)
> >>>
> >>> if (likely(!folio_test_large(folio))) {
> >>> mapcount = atomic_read(&folio->_mapcount) + 1;
> >>> - if (page_mapcount_is_type(mapcount))
> >>> - mapcount = 0;
> >>> + mapcount = page_mapcount_clear_type(mapcount);
> >>> return mapcount;
> >>> }
> >>> return folio_large_mapcount(folio);
> >>> diff --git a/include/linux/page-flags.h b/include/linux/page-flags.h
> >>> index 0e03d816e8b9..f3b0d1fa262d 100644
> >>> --- a/include/linux/page-flags.h
> >>> +++ b/include/linux/page-flags.h
> >>> @@ -934,9 +934,9 @@ static inline bool page_type_has_type(int page_type)
> >>> }
> >>>
> >>> /* This takes a mapcount which is one more than page->_mapcount */
> >>> -static inline bool page_mapcount_is_type(unsigned int mapcount)
> >>> +static inline unsigned int page_mapcount_clear_type(unsigned int mapcount)
> >>> {
> >>> - return page_type_has_type(mapcount - 1);
> >>> + return (unsigned int)(((int)(mapcount << 8)) >> 8);
> >>> }
> >>>
> >>> static inline bool page_has_type(const struct page *page)
> >>> @@ -953,16 +953,20 @@ static __always_inline void __folio_set_##fname(struct folio *folio) \
> >>> { \
> >>> if (folio_test_##fname(folio)) \
> >>> return; \
> >>> - VM_BUG_ON_FOLIO(data_race(folio->page.page_type) != UINT_MAX, \
> >>> + VM_BUG_ON_FOLIO(page_type_has_type(data_race(folio->page.page_type)), \
> >>> folio); \
> >>> - folio->page.page_type = (unsigned int)PGTY_##lname << 24; \
> >>> + folio->page.page_type &= ~(PGTY_mapcount_underflow << 24); \
> >>> + folio->page.page_type |= (unsigned int)PGTY_##lname << 24; \
> >>> } \
> >>> static __always_inline void __folio_clear_##fname(struct folio *folio) \
> >>> { \
> >>> - if (folio->page.page_type == UINT_MAX) \
> >>> + int mapcount; \
> >>> + \
> >>> + if (!page_type_has_type(folio->page.page_type)) \
> >>> return; \
> >>> VM_BUG_ON_FOLIO(!folio_test_##fname(folio), folio); \
> >>> - folio->page.page_type = UINT_MAX; \
> >>> + mapcount = atomic_read(&folio->page._mapcount); \
> >>> + folio->page.page_type = page_mapcount_clear_type(mapcount); \
> >>> }
> >>>
> >>> #define PAGE_TYPE_OPS(uname, lname, fname) \
> >>> @@ -975,15 +979,20 @@ static __always_inline void __SetPage##uname(struct page *page) \
> >>> { \
> >>> if (Page##uname(page)) \
> >>> return; \
> >>> - VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(data_race(page->page_type) != UINT_MAX, page); \
> >>> - page->page_type = (unsigned int)PGTY_##lname << 24; \
> >>> + VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(page_type_has_type(data_race(page->page_type)), \
> >>> + page); \
> >>> + page->page_type &= ~(PGTY_mapcount_underflow << 24); \
> >>> + page->page_type |= (unsigned int)PGTY_##lname << 24; \
> >>> } \
> >>> static __always_inline void __ClearPage##uname(struct page *page) \
> >>> { \
> >>> - if (page->page_type == UINT_MAX) \
> >>> + int mapcount; \
> >>> + \
> >>> + if (!page_type_has_type(page->page_type)) \
> >>> return; \
> >>> VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(!Page##uname(page), page); \
> >>> - page->page_type = UINT_MAX; \
> >>> + mapcount = atomic_read(&page->_mapcount); \
> >>> + page->page_type = page_mapcount_clear_type(mapcount); \
> >>> }
> >>>
> >>> /*
> >>> diff --git a/mm/debug.c b/mm/debug.c
> >>> index 77fa8fe1d641..9a932ded09d4 100644
> >>> --- a/mm/debug.c
> >>> +++ b/mm/debug.c
> >>> @@ -74,8 +74,7 @@ static void __dump_folio(const struct folio *folio, const struct page *page,
> >>> int mapcount = atomic_read(&page->_mapcount) + 1;
> >>> char *type = "";
> >>>
> >>> - if (page_mapcount_is_type(mapcount))
> >>> - mapcount = 0;
> >>> + mapcount = page_mapcount_clear_type(mapcount);
> >>>
> >>> pr_warn("page: refcount:%d mapcount:%d mapping:%p index:%#lx pfn:%#lx\n",
> >>> folio_ref_count(folio), mapcount, mapping,
> >>> ---
> >>>
> >>> Thoughts?
> >>
> >> God no.
> >
> > This is not final patch, but for sharing the rough idea *with code* -
> > maybe there are more points in code that should be adjusted by the
> > change. I just typed the draft patch quick just for sharing idea.
> >
> > If we should allow pp type pages to be used in mapping as well, then
> > we should allow a page to keep both its type and mapcount at the same
> > time. Am I missing something?
>
> We don't want code to accidentally overflow mapcounts into these bits and have
> them wrongly be detected as page types.
>
> This is just very fragile.
Okay. Thanks for the explanation. Plus, the adjustment I mentioned
might not be as simple as I thought it'd be.
So sorry about the noise. I'm a zombie now. I'll think about it after
some rest.
Byungchul
> --
> Cheers,
>
> David