Re: [PATCH v2] mm/shrinker: simplify shrinker_memcg_alloc() using guard()
From: SeongJae Park
Date: Wed May 13 2026 - 21:14:10 EST
On Wed, 13 May 2026 15:52:14 +0800 wangxuewen <18810879172@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> Use guard(mutex) to automatically handle shrinker_mutex locking and
> unlocking in shrinker_memcg_alloc(). This removes the explicit
> mutex_unlock() call, the goto-based error path, and the redundant
> ret variable, resulting in cleaner and more concise code.
>
> v2:
> - Drop unused 'ret' variable to avoid compiler warning (Muchun Song).
Patch changelog should go to commentary area [1]. Also adding links to
previous versions would be helpful.
>
> Signed-off-by: wangxuewen <wangxuewen@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> mm/shrinker.c | 13 +++++--------
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/shrinker.c b/mm/shrinker.c
> index 76b3f750cf65..cb03fbecc75d 100644
> --- a/mm/shrinker.c
> +++ b/mm/shrinker.c
> @@ -215,29 +215,26 @@ static DEFINE_IDR(shrinker_idr);
>
> static int shrinker_memcg_alloc(struct shrinker *shrinker)
> {
> - int id, ret = -ENOMEM;
> + int id;
>
> if (mem_cgroup_disabled())
> return -ENOSYS;
> if (mem_cgroup_kmem_disabled() && !(shrinker->flags & SHRINKER_NONSLAB))
> return -ENOSYS;
>
> - mutex_lock(&shrinker_mutex);
> + guard(mutex)(&shrinker_mutex);
> id = idr_alloc(&shrinker_idr, shrinker, 0, 0, GFP_KERNEL);
> if (id < 0)
> - goto unlock;
> + return id;
Could this change the return value? This code was always returning -ENOMEM
before, but seems it can now return -ENOSPC? Seems that doesn't matter,
though.
>
> if (id >= shrinker_nr_max) {
> if (expand_shrinker_info(id)) {
> idr_remove(&shrinker_idr, id);
> - goto unlock;
> + return -ENOMEM;
> }
> }
> shrinker->id = id;
> - ret = 0;
> -unlock:
> - mutex_unlock(&shrinker_mutex);
> - return ret;
> + return 0;
> }
[1] https://docs.kernel.org/process/submitting-patches.html#commentary
Thanks,
SJ
[...]