Re: [PATCH v6 02/13] coresight: etm4x: fix underflow for nrseqstate

[Leo Yan]

On Fri, May 15, 2026 at 12:10:45PM +0100, Yeoreum Yun wrote:

[...]

> TBH, the number of transition is determinied by the MAX number of
> SEQ_STATE that's why I think define the ETM_MAX_SEQ_TRANSITIONS with
> 
>      #define ETM_MAX_SEQ_TRANSITIONS (ETM_MAX_SEQ_STATE - 1)
> 
> and uses ETM_MAX_SEQ_TRANSITIONS for the TCRSEQEVR and seq_ctrl.
> 
> Thought?

Looks good to me.