Re: [PATCH 2/4] ASoC: stm: stm32_i2s: Use guard() for spin locks

[Mark Brown]

On Fri, May 15, 2026 at 11:48:55AM +0700, Bui Duc Phuc wrote:

> From a maintainer perspective, is there generally interest in gradually
> converging these drivers toward more modern/common PM patterns,
> or is preserving existing hardware-specific sequencing usually preferred
> unless there is a concrete issue to solve?

There are likely to be different considerations for different drivers,
on some systems the power savings from managing the clocks may not be
meaingful or we may need the clocks for register access.  In general
it's nicer to actively manage the clocks but it's not super urgent to do
so from a framework point of view, it's more a how much work the people
working on the individual drivers want to do and if there's a use case
for specific hardware.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature