Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] watchdog: sama5d4_wdt: Fix WDDIS handling for SAM9X60 and SAMA7G5

[Guenter Roeck]

Hi,

On 5/27/26 06:04, Balakrishnan.S@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> Hi Wim,
>
> Gentle ping — both patches have been reviewed. Could this be queued for
> the next cycle?

Please check linux-next to determine if patches are queued for the next
commit window.

Thanks,
Guenter

> Thanks,
> Balakrishnan
>
> On 02/03/26 5:03 pm, Balakrishnan Sambath wrote:
> > The sama5d4_wdt driver hardcodes AT91_WDT_WDDIS (bit 15) for WDDIS
> > detection, which is incorrect for SAM9X60 and SAMA7G5 that use bit 12
> > (AT91_SAM9X60_WDDIS). This series fixes the detection by introducing
> > a per-device wddis_mask and documents the bit position difference in
> > the header.
> >
> > Changes in v2:
> > - Reorder patches: fix first, documentation second
> > - Drop patch 3/3, not needed with wddis_mask approach
> > - Keep AT91_SAM9X60_* register names, drop _LEGACY/_MODERN naming
> > - Limit header changes to WDDIS comments and datasheet references
> >
> > Balakrishnan Sambath (2):
> >     watchdog: sama5d4_wdt: Fix WDDIS detection on SAM9X60 and SAMA7G5
> >     watchdog: at91sam9_wdt.h: Document WDDIS bit position per SoC family
> >
> >    drivers/watchdog/at91sam9_wdt.h |  6 +++--
> >    drivers/watchdog/sama5d4_wdt.c  | 48 +++++++++++++++------------------
> >    2 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)