Re: [v2 11/16] mm: handle PMD swap entries in non-present PMD walkers
From: Lance Yang
Date: Fri Jun 12 2026 - 11:22:00 EST
On 2026/6/12 23:05, Usama Arif wrote:
On 12/06/2026 07:45, Lance Yang wrote:
+Cc linux-mm
Please Cc linux-mm next time. Pretty clearly MM work ...
Yes, thanks for this! I forgot, will be careful in v3.
Cool.
On Tue, Jun 02, 2026 at 07:24:19AM -0700, Usama Arif wrote:
[...]
diff --git a/mm/mincore.c b/mm/mincore.c
index e5d13eea9234..3fee8a7b9d9d 100644
--- a/mm/mincore.c
+++ b/mm/mincore.c
@@ -172,7 +172,19 @@ static int mincore_pte_range(pmd_t *pmd, unsigned long addr, unsigned long end,
ptl = pmd_trans_huge_lock(pmd, vma);
if (ptl) {
- memset(vec, 1, nr);
+ if (pmd_present(*pmd)) {
+ memset(vec, 1, nr);
+ } else {
+ /*
+ * Non-present PMD: migration, device-private, or PMD
+ * swap entry. Route through mincore_swap() the same way
+ * the PTE path does -- the swap entry covers all 512
+ * slots, so the whole vec gets the same answer.
+ */
+ softleaf_t entry = softleaf_from_pmd(*pmd);
+
+ memset(vec, mincore_swap(entry, false), nr);
Looks buggy ...
That assumes one swap-cache lookup is enough for whole PMD-sized range.
I don't think that always holds ...
See do_huge_pmd_swap_page():
---8<---
folio = swap_cache_get_folio(swp_entry);
[...]
/*
* Folio should be PMD-sized; if not (e.g. split in swap cache),
* split the PMD swap entry and retry at PTE level.
*/
if (folio_nr_pages(folio) != HPAGE_PMD_NR) {
folio_unlock(folio);
folio_put(folio);
goto split_fallback;
}
---
it handles the case where swap_cache_get_folio() returns a folio that
is no longer PMD-sized. E.g. because it was split in the swap cache
while the PMD swap entry was installed. Then it split the PMD swap entry
and retries at PTE level :)
unuse_pmd_entry() has the same fallback. Can mincore hit that case?
Maybe the comment right above should say something like:
"
One lookup is enough for a PMD-sized swapcache folio. If the swapcache
was split, check the per-page swap slots.
"
Hopefully, I'm not missing something here :D
Cheers, Lance
Good catch! Thanks for pointing this out.
I think the below diff over this commit should be ok. I will add
it to the next revision. Its slower, but it shouldn't be an issue
as its just mincore:
Just skimmed it. That should do the trick. Will go through it
properly in v3 :)
Thanks, Lance
diff --git a/mm/mincore.c b/mm/mincore.c
index 3fee8a7b9d9d..975513fff336 100644
--- a/mm/mincore.c
+++ b/mm/mincore.c
@@ -175,15 +175,42 @@ static int mincore_pte_range(pmd_t *pmd, unsigned long addr, unsigned long end,
if (pmd_present(*pmd)) {
memset(vec, 1, nr);
} else {
- /*
- * Non-present PMD: migration, device-private, or PMD
- * swap entry. Route through mincore_swap() the same way
- * the PTE path does -- the swap entry covers all 512
- * slots, so the whole vec gets the same answer.
- */
softleaf_t entry = softleaf_from_pmd(*pmd);
- memset(vec, mincore_swap(entry, false), nr);
+ /*
+ * Non-present PMD: migration, device-private, or
+ * PMD swap entry. Migration / device-private cover
+ * the whole PMD range with a single answer.
+ */
+ if (!softleaf_is_swap(entry)) {
+ memset(vec, mincore_swap(entry, false), nr);
+ } else {
+ struct folio *folio = swap_cache_get_folio(entry);
+
+ /*
+ * One lookup is enough for a PMD-sized
+ * swapcache folio. If the swapcache was split
+ * (e.g. by deferred_split_scan() or
+ * memory_failure()) while the PMD swap entry
+ * was installed, check the per-page swap slots.
+ */
+ if (folio && folio_nr_pages(folio) == HPAGE_PMD_NR) {
+ memset(vec, folio_test_uptodate(folio), nr);
+ folio_put(folio);
+ } else {
+ unsigned long haddr = addr & HPAGE_PMD_MASK;
+ pgoff_t off = swp_offset(entry) +
+ ((addr - haddr) >> PAGE_SHIFT);
+
+ if (folio)
+ folio_put(folio);
+ for (i = 0; i < nr; i++)
+ vec[i] = mincore_swap(
+ swp_entry(swp_type(entry),
+ off + i),
+ false);
+ }
+ }
}
spin_unlock(ptl);
goto out;