Re: [PATCH v2] gpu: nova-core: clarify FSP ordering in the chipset table

[Timur Tabi]

On Fri, 2026-06-12 at 13:06 +0100, Gary Guo wrote:
> This would be inconsistent with the derived `PartialOrd` implementation?
> 
> If we consider Hopper to be after Ada, then we should be able to `assert!(GH100 > AD102);`

This is a comment about how we describe things, not how the code works.  It's because we
frequently say "Hopper or later" to describe our GPUs' capabilities.