Re: [PATCH v2] gpu: nova-core: clarify FSP ordering in the chipset table

[Timur Tabi]

On Fri, 2026-06-12 at 10:17 -0700, John Hubbard wrote:
> And clearly the comment has failed in its goal, seeing as how our
> first reader had trouble understanding what we meant. :)  Gary,
> any thoughts about how to clarify this? Or is this whole idea
> of talking about Hopper and later turning into a problem...?

I mean, it can't be a problem because that's how everyone in Nvidia talks.  The point of the
comment is to reconcile the language we use with the hardware register.

We're not going to stop saying "Hopper and later", and we're never going to mean that to include
Ada.  

We probably need to comment the Architecture enum too:

    pub(crate) enum Architecture with TryFrom<Bounded<u32, 6>> {
        Turing = 0x16,
        Ampere = 0x17,
        Hopper = 0x18,
        Ada = 0x19,
        BlackwellGB10x = 0x1a,
        BlackwellGB20x = 0x1b,
    }

Ugh.  Maybe we should swap Hopper and Ada here?