[PATCH v2] erofs: add folio order to trace_erofs_read_folio

[Zhan Xusheng]

erofs supports large folios for reads, but the actual folio order
instantiated in the page cache may be lower due to allocation
constraints such as memory fragmentation.

trace_erofs_read_folio already receives the folio being read but
currently records only its index. Add folio_order() to the tracepoint
so that users can observe the realized folio order and verify the
effectiveness of large folio reads.

Also drop the uptodate field: read_folio() is only called for a
non-uptodate folio, so it is always 0.

Suggested-by: Gao Xiang <hsiangkao@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Zhan Xusheng <zhanxusheng@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
 include/trace/events/erofs.h | 9 ++++-----
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/trace/events/erofs.h b/include/trace/events/erofs.h
index cd0e3fd8c23f..0a178cb10fb1 100644
--- a/include/trace/events/erofs.h
+++ b/include/trace/events/erofs.h
@@ -90,7 +90,7 @@ TRACE_EVENT(erofs_read_folio,
 		__field(erofs_nid_t,    nid     )
 		__field(int,		dir	)
 		__field(pgoff_t,	index	)
-		__field(int,		uptodate)
+		__field(unsigned int,	order	)
 		__field(bool,		raw	)
 	),
 
@@ -99,16 +99,15 @@ TRACE_EVENT(erofs_read_folio,
 		__entry->nid	= EROFS_I(inode)->nid;
 		__entry->dir	= S_ISDIR(inode->i_mode);
 		__entry->index	= folio->index;
-		__entry->uptodate = folio_test_uptodate(folio);
+		__entry->order	= folio_order(folio);
 		__entry->raw = raw;
 	),
 
-	TP_printk("dev = (%d,%d), nid = %llu, %s, index = %lu, uptodate = %d "
-		"raw = %d",
+	TP_printk("dev = (%d,%d), nid = %llu, %s, index = %lu, order = %u, raw = %d",
 		show_dev_nid(__entry),
 		show_file_type(__entry->dir),
 		(unsigned long)__entry->index,
-		__entry->uptodate,
+		__entry->order,
 		__entry->raw)
 );
 
-- 
2.43.0