Re: [PATCH 3/5] powerpc/fadump: remove unreachable memblock_reserve() return value checks
From: Mukesh Kumar Chaurasiya
Date: Wed Jun 17 2026 - 05:32:28 EST
On Wed, Jun 17, 2026 at 03:29:54AM +0900, Sang-Heon Jeon wrote:
> fadump_append_bootargs() and fadump_reserve_mem() both run from
> early_init_devtree(), before it calls memblock_allow_resize(). At that
> point memblock_reserve() either succeeds or panics, never returning an
> error.
>
> Therefore the return value checks are unreachable, so remove them and the
> related logic.
>
> No functional change.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sang-Heon Jeon <ekffu200098@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> arch/powerpc/kernel/fadump.c | 14 +++-----------
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/fadump.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/fadump.c
> index a313b1653124..88ca6156b81a 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/fadump.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/fadump.c
> @@ -154,13 +154,8 @@ void __init fadump_append_bootargs(void)
> if (!fw_dump.dump_active || !fw_dump.param_area_supported || !fw_dump.param_area)
> return;
>
> - if (fw_dump.param_area < fw_dump.boot_mem_top) {
> - if (memblock_reserve(fw_dump.param_area, COMMAND_LINE_SIZE)) {
> - pr_warn("WARNING: Can't use additional parameters area!\n");
> - fw_dump.param_area = 0;
> - return;
> - }
> - }
> + if (fw_dump.param_area < fw_dump.boot_mem_top)
> + memblock_reserve(fw_dump.param_area, COMMAND_LINE_SIZE);
>
> append_args = (char *)fw_dump.param_area;
> len = strlen(boot_command_line);
> @@ -632,10 +627,7 @@ int __init fadump_reserve_mem(void)
> (fw_dump.ops->fadump_setup_metadata(&fw_dump) < 0))
> goto error_out;
>
> - if (memblock_reserve(base, size)) {
> - pr_err("Failed to reserve memory!\n");
> - goto error_out;
> - }
> + memblock_reserve(base, size);
>
> pr_info("Reserved %lldMB of memory at %#016llx (System RAM: %lldMB)\n",
> (size >> 20), base, (memblock_phys_mem_size() >> 20));
> --
> 2.43.0
>
Yeah, that's a dead code.
Reviewed-by: Mukesh Kumar Chaurasiya (IBM) <mkchauras@xxxxxxxxx>