Re: [PATCH v5 1/2] sched/fair: Don't trigger active lb if src_rq->curr is not on_rq
From: Xin Zhao
Date: Thu Jun 18 2026 - 06:17:55 EST
On Thu, 18 Jun 2026 11:18:04 +0200 Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Perhaps because it is early and I've not had enough wake-up juice, or
> perhaps because it is too damn warm already and my brain is
> pre-emptively shutting down already, I found it very hard to read your
> Changelog.
>
> I asked one of these fancy AI things to rephrase things, and then did a
> manual edit on it and ended up with the below. Notably, the changelog
> talks about a sched_class check, while the actual patch has none of
> that.
>
> Does this work for you?
Thank you very much for correcting my poor English. Perhaps the large
language model I used simply couldn't handle my expressions in Chinese.
Once again, I appreciate your corrections on several inappropriate word
choices.
Presenting experimental data for both fair and !fair indicates that the
!fair scenario can also benefit from !on_rq filtering. I believe your
modified commit log is good enough.
Thanks
Xin Zhao