Re: [PATCH 3/3] mm: read remote memory without the mmap lock where possible

From: Usama Arif

Date: Thu Jun 18 2026 - 13:23:17 EST




On 18/06/2026 18:07, David Hildenbrand (Arm) wrote:
> On 6/18/26 19:01, Usama Arif wrote:
>> On Tue, 16 Jun 2026 15:03:00 -0400 Rik van Riel <riel@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>> __access_remote_vm() takes mmap_read_lock() for the entire transfer and
>>> uses get_user_pages_remote(), which faults pages in. For the common
>>> case of reading memory that is already resident -- /proc/PID/cmdline,
>>> /proc/PID/environ, ptrace PEEK of resident pages -- the mmap lock is
>>> unnecessary and is badly contended on large machines.
>>>
>>> Add an opportunistic, read-only fast path that transfers what it can
>>> without the mmap lock. For each address it takes the per-VMA lock with
>>> lock_vma_under_rcu(), re-checks the read-side VMA permissions, and uses
>>> folio_walk_start(..., FW_VMA_LOCKED) to grab a short-lived reference to
>>> a present page before copying it out. Anything non-trivial -- a not-
>>> present page (needs faulting), a hugetlb or VM_IO/VM_PFNMAP mapping, or
>>> a race with a VMA writer -- falls back to the existing mmap_lock path
>>> for the remainder.
>>>
>>> untagged_addr_remote() asserts the mmap lock, so add an unlocked variant
>>> for the fast path; the untag mask is a stable per-mm value.
>>>
>>> Only reads are handled here; writes keep using the slow path.
>>>
>>> Assisted-by: Claude:claude-opus-4-8
>>> Signed-off-by: Rik van Riel <riel@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> ---
>>> arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess_64.h | 12 +++
>>> include/linux/uaccess.h | 11 ++
>>> mm/memory.c | 166 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>>> 3 files changed, 188 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess_64.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess_64.h
>>> index 4a52497ba6a1..c6fac900a747 100644
>>> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess_64.h
>>> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess_64.h
>>> @@ -51,6 +51,18 @@ static inline unsigned long __untagged_addr_remote(struct mm_struct *mm,
>>> (__force __typeof__(addr))__untagged_addr_remote(mm, __addr); \
>>> })
>>>
>>> +/* Same as __untagged_addr_remote(), but usable without the mmap lock held. */
>>> +static inline unsigned long __untagged_addr_remote_unlocked(struct mm_struct *mm,
>>> + unsigned long addr)
>>> +{
>>> + return addr & READ_ONCE((mm)->context.untag_mask);
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +#define untagged_addr_remote_unlocked(mm, addr) ({ \
>>> + unsigned long __addr = (__force unsigned long)(addr); \
>>> + (__force __typeof__(addr))__untagged_addr_remote_unlocked(mm, __addr); \
>>> +})
>>> +
>>> #endif
>>>
>>> #define valid_user_address(x) \
>>> diff --git a/include/linux/uaccess.h b/include/linux/uaccess.h
>>> index 8a264662b242..c8c83372c9d8 100644
>>> --- a/include/linux/uaccess.h
>>> +++ b/include/linux/uaccess.h
>>> @@ -34,6 +34,17 @@
>>> })
>>> #endif
>>>
>>> +/*
>>> + * Like untagged_addr_remote(), but for callers that stabilize @mm by other
>>> + * means (e.g. a per-VMA lock) and must not assert the mmap lock.
>>> + */
>>> +#ifndef untagged_addr_remote_unlocked
>>> +#define untagged_addr_remote_unlocked(mm, addr) ({ \
>>> + (void)(mm); \
>>> + untagged_addr(addr); \
>>> +})
>>> +#endif
>>> +
>>> #ifdef masked_user_access_begin
>>> #define can_do_masked_user_access() 1
>>> # ifndef masked_user_write_access_begin
>>> diff --git a/mm/memory.c b/mm/memory.c
>>> index 86a973119bd4..0b23b82eaa18 100644
>>> --- a/mm/memory.c
>>> +++ b/mm/memory.c
>>> @@ -42,6 +42,8 @@
>>> #include <linux/kernel_stat.h>
>>> #include <linux/mm.h>
>>> #include <linux/mm_inline.h>
>>> +#include <linux/secretmem.h>
>>> +#include <linux/pagewalk.h>
>>> #include <linux/sched/mm.h>
>>> #include <linux/sched/numa_balancing.h>
>>> #include <linux/sched/task.h>
>>> @@ -7062,6 +7064,153 @@ int generic_access_phys(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long addr,
>>> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(generic_access_phys);
>>> #endif
>>>
>>> +/*
>>> + * The fast path uses folio_walk_start(FW_VMA_LOCKED), which needs the per-VMA
>>> + * lock and RCU-freed page tables to walk page tables without the mmap lock.
>>> + */
>>> +#if defined(CONFIG_PER_VMA_LOCK) && defined(CONFIG_MMU_GATHER_RCU_TABLE_FREE)
>>> +/*
>>> + * Opportunistic lockless fast path for __access_remote_vm() reads.
>>> + *
>>> + * Memory already resident in @mm can be read without taking the heavily
>>> + * contended mmap_lock: a per-VMA lock stabilizes the VMA, and folio_walk_start()
>>> + * with FW_VMA_LOCKED grabs a short-lived reference to a present page via an
>>> + * RCU/PTL protected page table walk (relying on MMU_GATHER_RCU_TABLE_FREE).
>>> + *
>>> + * Anything that would require faulting a page in, touching a hugetlb or
>>> + * VM_IO/VM_PFNMAP mapping, or that races a VMA writer is left to the mmap_lock
>>> + * path in __access_remote_vm(). Only reads are handled here.
>>> + *
>>> + * Returns the number of bytes transferred via the fast path.
>>> + */
>>> +static int access_remote_vm_fast(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr,
>>> + void *buf, int len, unsigned int gup_flags)
>>> +{
>>> + void *old_buf = buf;
>>> +
>>> + addr = untagged_addr_remote_unlocked(mm, addr);
>>> +
>>> + while (len) {
>>> + struct vm_area_struct *vma;
>>> + vm_flags_t vm_flags;
>>> +
>>> + vma = lock_vma_under_rcu(mm, addr);
>>> + if (!vma)
>>> + break;
>>> +
>>> + /*
>>> + * Mirror the read-side permission checks of check_vma_flags(),
>>> + * and exclude what FW_VMA_LOCKED cannot handle (hugetlb) or what
>>> + * needs the ->access() handler (VM_IO/VM_PFNMAP). Checked once
>>> + * per VMA; anything not positively allowed falls back to the
>>> + * slow path, which re-validates everything.
>>> + */
>>> + vm_flags = vma->vm_flags;
>>> + if ((vm_flags & (VM_IO | VM_PFNMAP)) ||
>>> + is_vm_hugetlb_page(vma) || vma_is_secretmem(vma) ||
>>> + (!(vm_flags & VM_READ) &&
>>> + (!(gup_flags & FOLL_FORCE) || !(vm_flags & VM_MAYREAD)))) {
>>> + vma_end_read(vma);
>>> + break;
>>> + }
>>
>> This should also do the FOLL_ANON check from check_vma_flags().
>>
>> check_vma_flags() rejects non-anonymous VMAs when FOLL_ANON is set:
>>
>> if ((gup_flags & FOLL_ANON) && !vma_anon)
>> return -EFAULT;
>
> Duplicating GUP logic in a non-GUP file. Splendid. :)
>

Haha probably just need a common helper.