Re: [RFC PATCH] reserve_mem: add support for static memory
From: Randy Dunlap
Date: Thu Jun 18 2026 - 19:03:00 EST
On 6/18/26 3:40 PM, Shyam Saini wrote:
> reserve_mem relies on dynamic memory allocation, this limits the
> usecase where memory and its address is required to be preserved
> across the boots. Eg: ramoops memory reservation on ACPI platforms
>
> So add support to pass a pre-determined static address and reserve
> memory at this specified address. This enables use case like ramoops
> on ACPI platforms to reliably access ramoops region across the boots.
>
> Also skip parsing of "align" parameter when static address is passed.
>
> Example syntax for static address
> reserve_mem=4M@0x1E0000000:oops ramoops.mem_name=oops
>
> Signed-off-by: Shyam Saini <shyamsaini@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> .../admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt | 15 ++++++
> mm/memblock.c | 48 +++++++++++++------
> 2 files changed, 49 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt b/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
> index b5493a7f8f228..7e0baca564b97 100644
> --- a/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
> @@ -6563,6 +6563,21 @@ Kernel parameters
>
> reserve_mem=12M:4096:oops ramoops.mem_name=oops
>
> + reserve_mem= [RAM]
According to this file (kernel-parameters.txt), "RAM" means that this
option applies when "RAM disk support is enabled."
Is that correct here?
My guess is that it's incorrect for the other (existing) "reserve_mem=" also.
> + Format: nn[KMG]:<@offset>:<label>
> + Reserve physical memory at pre-determined location and label it with
Preferably predetermined
> + a name that other subsystems can use to access it. This is typically
> + used for systems that do not wipe the RAM, and this command
> + line will try to reserve the same physical memory on
> + soft reboots. Note, it is guaranteed to be the same
> + location unless some other early allocation for eg: crashkernel=256M
allocation, e.g.: crashkernel=256M
> + (without static address) is reserved or overlapps this region.
overlaps
> +
> + The format is size:offset:label for example, to request
> + 4 megabytes for ramoops at 0x1E0000000:
> +
> + reserve_mem=4M@0x1E0000000:oops ramoops.mem_name=oops
> +
> reservetop= [X86-32,EARLY]
> Format: nn[KMG]
> Reserves a hole at the top of the kernel virtual
> diff --git a/mm/memblock.c b/mm/memblock.c
> index 6349c48154f4b..79f1f806ea364 100644
> --- a/mm/memblock.c
> +++ b/mm/memblock.c
> @@ -2721,6 +2721,7 @@ static int __init reserve_mem(char *p)
> char *name;
> char *oldp;
> int len;
> + bool addr_is_static = false;
>
> if (!p)
> goto err_param;
> @@ -2739,16 +2740,27 @@ static int __init reserve_mem(char *p)
> if (*p != ':')
> goto err_param;
>
> - align = memparse(p+1, &p);
> + /* parse the static memory address */
> + if (*p == '@') {
> + start = memparse(p+1, &p);
> + addr_is_static = true;
> + }
> +
> if (*p != ':')
> goto err_param;
>
> - /*
> - * memblock_phys_alloc() doesn't like a zero size align,
> - * but it is OK for this command to have it.
> - */
> - if (align < SMP_CACHE_BYTES)
> - align = SMP_CACHE_BYTES;
> + if (!addr_is_static) {
> + align = memparse(p+1, &p);
> + if (*p != ':')
> + goto err_param;
> +
> + /*
> + * memblock_phys_alloc() doesn't like a zero size align,
> + * but it is OK for this command to have it.
> + */
> + if (align < SMP_CACHE_BYTES)
> + align = SMP_CACHE_BYTES;
> + }
>
> name = p + 1;
> len = strlen(name);
> @@ -2772,16 +2784,24 @@ static int __init reserve_mem(char *p)
> }
>
> /* Pick previous allocations up from KHO if available */
> - if (reserve_mem_kho_revive(name, size, align))
> + if (!addr_is_static && reserve_mem_kho_revive(name, size, align))
> return 1;
>
> - /* TODO: Allocation must be outside of scratch region */
> - start = memblock_phys_alloc(size, align);
> - if (!start) {
> - pr_err("reserve_mem: memblock allocation failed\n");
> - return -ENOMEM;
> - }
> + if (addr_is_static) {
> + if (memblock_reserve(start, size)) {
> + pr_err("reserve_mem: memblock reservation failed\n");
> + return -ENOMEM;
> + }
> +
> + } else {
> + /* TODO: Allocation must be outside of scratch region */
> + start = memblock_phys_alloc(size, align);
> + if (!start) {
> + pr_err("reserve_mem: memblock allocation failed\n");
> + return -ENOMEM;
> + }
>
> + }
> reserved_mem_add(start, size, name);
>
> return 1;
__setup() functions return 1 for "yes, I handled this option" (even if there
were errors in it) and 0 for failure ("no idea what this string/option means").
These -ENOMEM, -EINVAL, -EBUSY (in this function) are non-zero so they look like
success and should not be here.
--
~Randy