Re: [PATCH 4/4] tracing: trace_fprobe: fix typo in function name

From: Google

Date: Thu Jun 18 2026 - 19:44:15 EST


On Thu, 7 May 2026 10:09:09 +0200
Martin Kaiser <martin@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> The function name should be __register_tracepoint_fprobe.
>

This looks good to me. Let me pick it.

Thanks,

> Signed-off-by: Martin Kaiser <martin@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> kernel/trace/trace_fprobe.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_fprobe.c b/kernel/trace/trace_fprobe.c
> index 9f5f08c0e7c2..4d1abbf66229 100644
> --- a/kernel/trace/trace_fprobe.c
> +++ b/kernel/trace/trace_fprobe.c
> @@ -764,7 +764,7 @@ static int unregister_fprobe_event(struct trace_fprobe *tf)
> return trace_probe_unregister_event_call(&tf->tp);
> }
>
> -static int __regsiter_tracepoint_fprobe(struct trace_fprobe *tf)
> +static int __register_tracepoint_fprobe(struct trace_fprobe *tf)
> {
> struct tracepoint_user *tuser __free(tuser_put) = NULL;
> struct module *mod __free(module_put) = NULL;
> @@ -836,7 +836,7 @@ static int __register_trace_fprobe(struct trace_fprobe *tf)
> tf->fp.flags &= ~FPROBE_FL_DISABLED;
>
> if (trace_fprobe_is_tracepoint(tf))
> - return __regsiter_tracepoint_fprobe(tf);
> + return __register_tracepoint_fprobe(tf);
>
> /* TODO: handle filter, nofilter or symbol list */
> return register_fprobe(&tf->fp, tf->symbol, NULL);
> --
> 2.43.7
>


--
Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@xxxxxxxxxx>