Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] powerpc: fix preempt_count imbalances in perf and kexec paths

[IBM]

Aboorva Devarajan <aboorvad@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> Hi all,
>
> This patch series fixes some minor preempt_count bookkeeping issues in
> arch/powerpc/ found during a preemption leak audit prompted by the
> lazy/full preemption model changes. These are get_cpu/put_cpu and
> get_cpu_var/put_cpu_var pairing errors that leave preempt_count
> incorrectly elevated or underflowed.
>

All 3 patches looks good. Aren't these candidates for stable tree?
Then why not add Cc: tag too?

For all 3 -
Reviewed-by: Ritesh Harjani (IBM) <ritesh.list@xxxxxxxxx>