Re: [PATCH] usbip: vudc: fix NULL deref in vep_dequeue()
From: Igor Kotrasinski/Security (PLT) /SRPOL/Engineer/Samsung Electronics
Date: Fri Jun 19 2026 - 08:34:29 EST
Hi,
> From: Sam Day <me@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> vep_alloc_request() wasn't initializing vrequest->udc, so cancellations
> on the FunctionFS AIO path were arriving in vep_dequeue without a valid
> UDC reference.
>
> AFAICT this bug has existed for ~10 years. Seems that nobody has really
> stressed the FunctionFS AIO path on usbip's vudc.
>
> I tested this fix in a QEMU aarch64 guest driving FunctionFS endpoints
> via AIO. Before the fix, running `usbip attach` from the host would
> cause the guest to oops with the following backtrace:
>
> Call trace:
> vep_dequeue+0x1c/0xe4 (P)
> usb_ep_dequeue+0x14/0x20
> ffs_aio_cancel+0x24/0x34
> __arm64_sys_io_cancel+0xb0/0x124
> do_el0_svc+0x68/0x100
> el0_svc+0x18/0x5c
> el0t_64_sync_handler+0x98/0xdc
> el0t_64_sync+0x154/0x158
>
> Assisted-by: opencode:openai/gpt-5.5
> Fixes: b6a0ca111867 ("usbip: vudc: Add UDC specific ops")
> Signed-off-by: Sam Day <me@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/usb/usbip/vudc_dev.c | 3 +++
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/usb/usbip/vudc_dev.c b/drivers/usb/usbip/vudc_dev.c
> index c5f079c5a1ea..2f1f141909b2 100644
> --- a/drivers/usb/usbip/vudc_dev.c
> +++ b/drivers/usb/usbip/vudc_dev.c
> @@ -279,15 +279,18 @@ static int vep_disable(struct usb_ep *_ep)
> static struct usb_request *vep_alloc_request(struct usb_ep *_ep,
> gfp_t mem_flags)
> {
> + struct vep *ep;
> struct vrequest *req;
>
> if (!_ep)
> return NULL;
> + ep = to_vep(_ep);
>
> req = kzalloc_obj(*req, mem_flags);
> if (!req)
> return NULL;
>
> + req->udc = ep_to_vudc(ep);
We can get rid of udc in struct vrequest and call ep_to_vudc() in
vep_dequeue(). All the other places do it, I think I missed that one
during a refactor before submitting the driver.
> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&req->req_entry);
>
> return &req->req;
>
> ---
> base-commit: 5cd1731cc883a9914d91e3b93d4597317b5b5339
> change-id: 20260619-usbip-vudc-deque-fix-d316de3d3f16
>
> Best regards,
Side note, there are some checks for udc->driver being NULL that I feel
are either redundant or should be behind a spinlock, just like setting
udc->driver is. I'm not sure which, will have to take a look.
BRs,
Igor Kotrasiński