Re: [PATCH v2 5/8] KVM: arm64: Add host and hypervisor vCPU lookup primitives

From: Vincent Donnefort

Date: Fri Jun 19 2026 - 09:33:39 EST


On Fri, Jun 19, 2026 at 08:07:16AM +0100, Fuad Tabba wrote:
> From: Marc Zyngier <maz@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> The nVHE hypervisor repeatedly resolves a host vCPU into the EL2
> address space and validates that the loaded hyp vCPU matches it, with
> that logic open-coded in each handler.
>
> Add __get_host_hyp_vcpus() and the get_host_hyp_vcpus() macro, which
> translate the host vCPU into the hypervisor's address space and, when
> pKVM is enabled, also return the loaded hyp vCPU if it matches. If pKVM
> is enabled but the loaded hyp vCPU does not correspond to the requested
> host vCPU, both the host and hyp vCPU are returned as NULL. Convert
> handle___kvm_vcpu_run() to use it.
>
> No functional change intended.
>
> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Co-developed-by: Fuad Tabba <tabba@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Fuad Tabba <tabba@xxxxxxxxxx>

Reviewed-by: Vincent Donnefort <vdonnefort@xxxxxxxxxx>

> ---
> arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/hyp-main.c | 52 ++++++++++++++++++++++--------
> 1 file changed, 38 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/hyp-main.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/hyp-main.c
> index 1d01c6e547f5..8923f594c264 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/hyp-main.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/hyp-main.c
> @@ -212,14 +212,45 @@ static void handle___pkvm_vcpu_put(struct kvm_cpu_context *host_ctxt)
> pkvm_put_hyp_vcpu(hyp_vcpu);
> }
>
> -static void handle___kvm_vcpu_run(struct kvm_cpu_context *host_ctxt)
> +static struct kvm_vcpu *__get_host_hyp_vcpus(struct kvm_vcpu *arg,
> + struct pkvm_hyp_vcpu **hyp_vcpup)
> {
> - DECLARE_REG(struct kvm_vcpu *, host_vcpu, host_ctxt, 1);
> - int ret;
> + struct kvm_vcpu *host_vcpu = kern_hyp_va(arg);
> + struct pkvm_hyp_vcpu *hyp_vcpu = NULL;
>
> if (unlikely(is_protected_kvm_enabled())) {
> - struct pkvm_hyp_vcpu *hyp_vcpu = pkvm_get_loaded_hyp_vcpu();
> + hyp_vcpu = pkvm_get_loaded_hyp_vcpu();
>
> + if (!hyp_vcpu || hyp_vcpu->host_vcpu != host_vcpu) {
> + hyp_vcpu = NULL;
> + host_vcpu = NULL;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + *hyp_vcpup = hyp_vcpu;
> + return host_vcpu;
> +}
> +
> +#define get_host_hyp_vcpus(ctxt, regnr, hyp_vcpup) \
> + ({ \
> + DECLARE_REG(struct kvm_vcpu *, __vcpu, ctxt, regnr); \
> + __get_host_hyp_vcpus(__vcpu, hyp_vcpup); \
> + })
> +
> +static void handle___kvm_vcpu_run(struct kvm_cpu_context *host_ctxt)
> +{
> + struct pkvm_hyp_vcpu *hyp_vcpu;
> + struct kvm_vcpu *host_vcpu;
> + int ret;
> +
> + host_vcpu = get_host_hyp_vcpus(host_ctxt, 1, &hyp_vcpu);
> +
> + if (!host_vcpu) {
> + ret = -EINVAL;
> + goto out;
> + }
> +
> + if (unlikely(hyp_vcpu)) {
> /*
> * KVM (and pKVM) doesn't support SME guests for now, and
> * ensures that SME features aren't enabled in pstate when
> @@ -231,23 +262,16 @@ static void handle___kvm_vcpu_run(struct kvm_cpu_context *host_ctxt)
> goto out;
> }
>
> - if (!hyp_vcpu) {
> - ret = -EINVAL;
> - goto out;
> - }
> -
> flush_hyp_vcpu(hyp_vcpu);
>
> ret = __kvm_vcpu_run(&hyp_vcpu->vcpu);
>
> sync_hyp_vcpu(hyp_vcpu);
> } else {
> - struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu = kern_hyp_va(host_vcpu);
> -
> /* The host is fully trusted, run its vCPU directly. */
> - fpsimd_lazy_switch_to_guest(vcpu);
> - ret = __kvm_vcpu_run(vcpu);
> - fpsimd_lazy_switch_to_host(vcpu);
> + fpsimd_lazy_switch_to_guest(host_vcpu);
> + ret = __kvm_vcpu_run(host_vcpu);
> + fpsimd_lazy_switch_to_host(host_vcpu);
> }
> out:
> cpu_reg(host_ctxt, 1) = ret;
> --
> 2.55.0.rc0.738.g0c8ab3ebcc-goog
>