Re: [PATCH] mm: memcg: remove stray text from obj_stock_pcp comment

[Guopeng Zhang]

在 2026/6/23 16:42, Harry Yoo 写道:
>
> On 6/23/26 5:26 PM, Guopeng Zhang wrote:
>> From: Guopeng Zhang <zhangguopeng@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> A patch filename was accidentally inserted into the comment describing
>> the nr_bytes field of struct obj_stock_pcp. Remove it.
> nit: perhaps add something like
> "Fix a typo in the comment (target -> targets)"?
Hi Harry,

Thanks for the review and the Ack.

Yes, I also fixed the "target -> targets" typo, but missed mentioning it
in the commit message. I'll be more careful about describing all changes
clearly next time. If a respin is needed, I'll add it to the commit
message and carry your Acked-by.

Thanks,
Guopeng

>> No functional change.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Guopeng Zhang <zhangguopeng@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
> FWIW,
> Acked-by: Harry Yoo (Oracle) <harry@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Thanks!
>
>>  mm/memcontrol.c | 2 +-
>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
>> index 6dc4888a90f3..3eedfc4e84a0 100644
>> --- a/mm/memcontrol.c
>> +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
>> @@ -2039,7 +2039,7 @@ struct obj_stock_pcp {
>>  	/*
>>  	 * On rare archs with 256KiB base page size (hexagon and powerpc 44x)
>>  	 * keep nr_bytes to unsigned int as uint16_t cannot represent the full
>> -e patches/memcg-uint16_t-for-nr_bytes-in-obj_stock_pcp.patch	 * sub-page remainder. Such archs are not cacheline optimization target.
>> +	 * sub-page remainder. Such archs are not cacheline optimization targets.
>>  	 */
>>  	unsigned int nr_bytes[NR_OBJ_STOCK];
>>  #else