[RFC PATCH] regulator: da9121: Use subvariant ids in the I2C table

[Pengpeng Hou]

da9121_i2c_probe() stores i2c_get_match_data() in chip->subvariant_id
and da9121_assign_chip_model() switches on DA9121_SUBTYPE_* values.  The
OF table provides those subvariant values, but the I2C id table
currently provides DA9121_TYPE_* values.

Make the I2C id table use the same subvariant namespace as the OF table
so non-DT I2C matches feed the expected data type into the model
assignment code.

Signed-off-by: Pengpeng Hou <pengpeng@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 drivers/regulator/da9121-regulator.c | 18 +++++++++---------
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/regulator/da9121-regulator.c b/drivers/regulator/da9121-regulator.c
index ef161eb0ca27..e4c429000b67 100644
--- a/drivers/regulator/da9121-regulator.c
+++ b/drivers/regulator/da9121-regulator.c
@@ -1166,15 +1166,15 @@ static void da9121_i2c_remove(struct i2c_client *i2c)
 }
 
 static const struct i2c_device_id da9121_i2c_id[] = {
-	{"da9121", DA9121_TYPE_DA9121_DA9130},
-	{"da9130", DA9121_TYPE_DA9121_DA9130},
-	{"da9217", DA9121_TYPE_DA9217},
-	{"da9122", DA9121_TYPE_DA9122_DA9131},
-	{"da9131", DA9121_TYPE_DA9122_DA9131},
-	{"da9220", DA9121_TYPE_DA9220_DA9132},
-	{"da9132", DA9121_TYPE_DA9220_DA9132},
-	{"da9141", DA9121_TYPE_DA9141},
-	{"da9142", DA9121_TYPE_DA9142},
+	{"da9121", DA9121_SUBTYPE_DA9121},
+	{"da9130", DA9121_SUBTYPE_DA9130},
+	{"da9217", DA9121_SUBTYPE_DA9217},
+	{"da9122", DA9121_SUBTYPE_DA9122},
+	{"da9131", DA9121_SUBTYPE_DA9131},
+	{"da9220", DA9121_SUBTYPE_DA9220},
+	{"da9132", DA9121_SUBTYPE_DA9132},
+	{"da9141", DA9121_SUBTYPE_DA9141},
+	{"da9142", DA9121_SUBTYPE_DA9142},
 	{},
 };
 MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(i2c, da9121_i2c_id);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)